Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Errotica Archives

Errotica Archives (0)

Drooler (0) 07-24-08  02:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

New Look

Out with the old, in with the new. Errotica Archives now has a new look, which is more visually appealing overall. The thumbs are easier to see in the galleries.

The interface has also changed some, but I don't think it's all for the better. Used to be you could click a photo size (small, medium, or large) and then click a thumb which would show the full pic in a new window; then you could repeat that with other thumbs.

But now if you click "large" and view a pic from a thumb and go back, it RESETS to the smaller default pic size every time. That's a nuisance.

And if you choose "zipped" within the thumbs page, it takes you to the previous "cover" page where the zip links are located. It's a minor bother, I suppose, but why not do it as FemJoy now does, with all of the zip sizes linked right on the thumbs page?

There's also a search engine where you can select characteristics of the models (hair color, etc. -- and even Zodiac sign!). Or you can browse by name, A-Z.

But this is all about the design. Content-wise, and as Rocker pointed out in the previous comment, the photo resolution "sux." I just looked at the Wanda "Rapidly" gallery and found some large pics to have too much blurriness!

So here we've gone again. Another site gets a face lift, but the quality of the content -- the most important thing! -- is still being neglected.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Denner (0) Thanks for that update on EA....
Reading the first part - I thought: maybe EA has come around with better content, better allround....
But it seems to be a socalled "facelift" - like when a four-five year old car-model needs reneweal - we change a little bit here and a little bit there......but when it comes down to facts...most is just the same old story.

07-24-08  08:57am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Yes, it is like that old car. You're going along, and everything seems to be working well, and then ... screeech! ... you come upon the scene of an accident! Image number 23!

"I couldn't get a good look at the girl's face, officer. There was so much excessive light shining, with heavy contrasting shadows. And it was all just a big blur anyway."

07-24-08  12:01pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.