Review Replies (6)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
Hi There just wondered why a 95?
If the site doesnt update or did I miss read this?
I can see liking the model but never seen such a high rating for and archiving site at this time.
Great review though.
I mean if you say the model doesnt do the site anymore, ummm then why join>? Not being sacastic, just I saw this as a huge CON, not just a small one.
Just confused by the high rating if content isnt updated?
Thanks
|
09-09-08 09:01am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Cybertoad :
Few things on your comment. First, there is way too much emphasis put on current updates on all sites. Let me give you an example.
Lets say site A opened last month and has daily updates of Eve Angel content. By the time your month was up, you would have access to maybe 10 GB of content. This site has over 80 GB of Eve movies and around 30 GB of her pictures.
Each month, content of her on this site ranged between 3-8 new GB of content, when you look at the total number which is one of the largest sites of a solo model, it still has more content than the next 10 sites combined, that feature Eve. Going by that, the daily update isn't a big deal to me.
If you also notice, I reviewed it as a one month join site. It would take a month to download all of the content on the site, unless you downloaded it for 24 hours a day.
What I'm saying, which is worth more 3-8 new GBs of content per month or around 120 GB?
As for the updates, it still updates, the friends content is new to the site, the Eve content is old content they are recycling. And my main point is still, this is an Eve Angel site, for fans of her, 120 GB of just Eve for $15 is the best deal on the internet. That would be like getting 30 full length DVDs of her for $15.
The only way that the no new updates is a con is if you have all the content already on the site. If you have none of it, there are over 200 movies and 200 picture sets of Eve, you could just download one video and one photo set per day and say those were daily updates. See what I mean?
Last, I didn't take it as sarcastic, and can understand why you would question a score, but keep in mind that all of us are different in our tastes, in our understanding or in the concept of numbers, so the number I give the site shouldn't be the first thing you look at. Instead, look at the facts in the review, 400 video/pic sets of Eve Angel, that to me is near perfect.
Thanks for the reply
|
09-09-08 10:14am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - exotics4me :
Thanks for the reply.
Actually I do not look at the score first, i look last.
If you review my comments I make elsewhere I tend to comment on the content as I did yours.
Why yes I am aware these are indiviual views.
The point of comments is to look at what others say about a site.
Looking at cost vs content etc.
I agree its your views, as a personal favorite I adore Catalina Cruz, but many do not think the site is that great nor agree with what I would think on it.
But if I gave a 90+ review in most cases when there is a Con, that doesnt fit the norm ppl will ask as I did.
Looking back I gave a high rating once before on a near perfect site and got a negative review (no trust).
So when I comment on any site in the 90's I tend to be picky.
and honest.
I guess we will agree to disagree, as I think a model should be involved in updates. A site that doesnt have that should do a name change ( my opinion of course).
But was a good review.
Thanks
Cybertoad
|
09-09-08 10:51am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Cybertoad :
I don't know what we are agreeing to disagree about. I glanced at your reviews, you gave Rachel Aziani's solo site a 91, it doesn't have half the content of Eve's site that I reviewed. And it only updates once per week, so it isn't going to get near Eve's amount of content anytime soon. So, I don't know why you would mention content vs. cost.
You think getting a negative review for giving a high score is bad? I took 20 points off a site's score because they had a 10 GB monthly download limit. I put in the review clearly that if the limit wasn't there, I would have gave the site a 90, instead of a 70. The site actually went back and removed their download limit and made it unlimited and I went back and added the 20 points back to the score, the negative review is still there though.
You said, "I tend to be picky and honest" the review is 100% honest, I tell that there is no new Eve content coming out, the amount of content, the quality of that content and so on, nothing dishonest there.
You don't seem to follow my concept of Eve not being involved anymore when you say the model should be involved in updates and should do a name change. There are 200+ videos of EVE, 200+ picture sets of EVE that are still there for download, why would they change the name? Also, about the name change, that isn't something for me to say. I think they should make it clear that they don't have any new Eve content, but why change the name of a site when more than half of the content there is of Eve Angel? That wouldn't make much sense.
Last, I do put the cons I can find, but I don't see why a con would stop a site from getting a 90+ score. If you look at the TBP reviews, the sites with 90+ have cons in the reviews. Also, if you look at solo models in the TBP reviews, you will see that Eve's site is listed as the #3 solo site by the TBP reviewers by score. At one time, it was #1. I do think that you agree that these are individual views, but then again, you are telling me how YOU would do a review or what you think should happen with the site name. If you ever need a site to join, try Eve's out, it is cheap at $15 and download all of her content off there. Like I said earlier, if we put these on DVDs there would be 30 four hour DVDs or 60 two hour DVDs worth of content with Eve in all of the scenes. Surely not having a daily update would be offset by getting what is equal to 25 cent two hour DVDs?
|
09-09-08 05:31pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - exotics4me :
Thanks for the reply.
Comments are just that comments.
When you write a review you understand it may be commmented on.
Its how I feel and those are my comments.
Comments are not supposed to become a debating issue.
Seems thats were its heading here.
This is how I feel and it won't change by trying to convince me,
nor can I convince you my point.
Thats agreeing and disagreeing.
So I will leave it at this. I feel my point is valid.
You don't.
Cybertoad,
PS feel free to always
comment on any review I write
I will respect what you comment on.
Thats how this stuff works.
|
09-09-08 11:20pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Cybertoad :
My best advice to you is to stop trying to talk down to me. "Thats how this stuff works" and "Comments are not supposed to become a debating issue."
According to the site, "What's the intention of replies? #4 says, "Engage in a related conversation or debate." When you question something I put in a review, it is my right to explain and if need be, debate my point. It is one of the rules of what the comments are for. I've been here since the site started, I know how the site works. Also, I noticed in one of your reviews that you talked about not being able to edit a review that you wished you had scored lower. From my own experiences, you can click "edit review" and change the score. I've done it on several sites that were not as good after the initial thought that a site was great. Try it and see.
|
09-10-08 12:52am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
