| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
elonlybuster (0)
|
I've seen lots of sites where the user controls a character in a series of sex acts, but virtual reality will just take the cake. Would be quite interesting to see
|
10-26-08 04:10am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
pat362 (0)
|
I picked others because the technology is not here yet for anything like true virtual reality. You could create a world like World of Warcraft or maybe like the Simms, but I don't think any of us would get very interested in make belief charaters having virtual sex on screen. What is much closer to reality is 100% all CGI characters having on screen sex. There have been a couple of movies, but the charaters were cartoonish. What I'm mean
is a CGI character of a well known actress having
sex with whomever you want. Think Lindsey Lohan
having sex with Jennifer Anniston. That kind of technology is within reach. Just look at Beoful to see how far an all CGI movie has come.
|
10-26-08 05:38am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
"Virtual Reality Porn" could be interpreted as either virtual observation of others having sex or virtual particpation in sex, I think. I do wonder how others read the term.
And I interpret it as something you'd access by your home computer or even perhaps in a brick-and-mortar establishment -- though I doubt it would get very far in the US using the latter approach. A virtual reality in which you'd mercilessly slaughter other human beings would be far more culturally acceptable.
Anyway, virtual sex for the subscriber, whatever that would entail, would at least help with STD control. But would it contribute positively or negatively to relationships with the significant "other" part of society? I'm just wondering.
|
10-26-08 05:54am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :
Good points, Drooler. In the USA showing a tit (E.G. Janet Jackson) is far more outragious than sawing up living human beings (AKA "Saw" 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.)
|
10-26-08 07:29am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Jay G :
Your examples make the point very clearly: One moment of bare breast is far more taboo than countless hours of the most brutal and graphic violence.
Makes me think of that old Woody Allen movie, "Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Sex," with that big boob bouncing its way through the countryside. That thing would scare Freddie and Jason shitless.
|
10-26-08 07:47am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Monahan (0)
|
Concept makes no real sense. The concept of porn is the notion that real copulation is occurring and that the watcher is stimulated by the fantasy that he/she is participating.
I would like to see technology permit olfactory transmission and/or user directed multiple camera angles.
|
10-26-08 10:55am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
apoctom (0)
|
Lots of interesting discussion so far. I think that more details would need to be presented in order for me to make a real decision.
|
10-26-08 10:28pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
I said "not sure" because while I think the idea is interesting I don't think the technology is there yet. By "virtual porn" I think of a situation where you get to control or direct what happens in a scene; not the super duper futuristic sex with your computer type stuff. I think there are too many programming hurdles and too much expense associated with doing it "right" where you would come out with a decent affordable product at this point.
|
10-27-08 11:22am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
Not sure. I am not really into virtual reality anything. I like the real thing. Is there a such thing as computerized pussy?! :D
|
10-27-08 06:44pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
Free Homemade Amateur Websites. :D I just like looking at Homemade Amateur now cause Professional Porn is getting rediculous!! REALLY!! >:(
|
11-09-08 11:18pm
Reply To Message
|
