| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Monahan (0)
|
Great review, asmith12. I couldn't nail my problem with Met Art until I read your comments. Then it hit me. There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics. Gorgeous babes shot beautifully, but something is missing.
And that explains why I found the videos to be unsatisfying; most of them are simply someone videotaping a photo shoot with all the emotion of an ice cube melting.
Private once had a series of videos of their hardcore shoots and it bombed out. Who wants to see a guy about to get a BJ being told to move over a little bit for a better angle, or a full vaginal insertion being delayed as the lighting is reset?
Porn is about fantasy and emotion. Met Art misses that element, IMO.
|
09-29-08 08:37am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :
> There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics.
Exactly; thanks for expressing my feelings it this concise and exact way; IMHO it's a perfect way to describe it in one sentence instead of my long and maybe not so clear description.
|
09-29-08 09:08am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
exotics4me (0)
|
Hey asmith12,
I also had a problem with the "moods" of the models on Met Art, I think I referred to as, "What is that on that far away mountain away from the cameraman?" They look like they are trying to pose naturally, like they are distant and caught in a moment of thought. My attempt to show that the pictures are too dramatic for their own good isn't working ha ha.
I do like the models, but one thing that really hurts is that a lot of the models have been seen on other sites, in much more playful, fun sets where they give off a whole other vibe. That's it! The models look too serious on Met-Art. On the basis of the site's quality though, there is very little, if anything to ever complain about as you pointed out. It just feels like the personality from the models is lacking. Great review.
|
09-29-08 11:39am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - exotics4me :
Right; as Monahan has put it:
"There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics."
|
09-29-08 12:05pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
hondaman (Suspended)
|
Not sure what you mean by "lack of fire". That seems to me to be what MET-Art models show that other errotic sites dont but everyone has their own opnion.
|
11-13-08 07:26pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
hondaman (Suspended)
|
What do you mean lack of search? Did you not see the search bar at the top right on the site? If you click it you have:
advanced search the options cover
shaved(pubic hair)shaved,trimmed,not trimmed
location: inside,outside
hair color:black,blonde,brown,red
eye color:black,blue,brown,green
weight: in Kgs
height: in cm
Photographer: all Photographer names
model: all model names
breast size:small,medium,large
country:all 180 of them(will show all models from that country)
ethnicity:variuos races
Are you sure that you where ever a member of this site? As I dont see how you can say that there is no search when there most certinaly is one on the site.
|
11-13-08 08:41pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - hondaman :
> Not sure what you mean by "lack of fire".
I've meant that at least most of Met-Art models are plastic dollies without any personality. Please read my review and also comments of the other PU'ers to my review.
> Are you sure that you where ever a member of this site?
Yes, I am. Also I'm sure of lots of the other things, though not 100% sure about search on Met-Arts. If it is there, good for them, but my rating stays (I even think of reducing it because of "lack of fire", which IMHO is not compensated by brilliant photo work and locations); just wondering: are ALL Russian models have so little personality?
|
11-14-08 11:40am
Reply To Message
|
