| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
surferman (0)
|
I have put ability to download, because quite simply, if I could not download, I would not join.
However, obviously quality and price are extremely important, as if it is too expensive, or if the quality is crap, then that would also be a no no!
|
10-04-08 03:30am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
TheRizzo (0)
|
Quality of content is #1 but I also want to see a good array of content and the price in line with the quanity of current content and update schedule.
I will never pay more than $30 for one site.
|
10-04-08 08:32am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
I just made the mistake of joining a site that said I could download a high quality video to find out I couldnt chaffed my hyde. But thats it right there as Surfman said downloadable fore sure but must be high quality, unless its my favorite models then I will just about download anything and joing if the price is right. That said I joined 1byday recently and did so based on quailty because its stunning how good some of that stuff is , but wouldnt have joined if couldnt download
LOL and I have paid over 30.00 foir 1byday and wasnt disapointed, but I thought i would be only site so far that price didnt piss me off after seeing content. Its still high but there is good stuff.
|
10-04-08 09:16am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Monahan (0)
|
I'd answer 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 if a multiple answer were permitted.
D/L ability is the key option for me however. I will never knowingly sign up for any site that does not permit easy and DRM free downloads. That's binary. I stop looking when I see a download issue.
The other elements are subjective. Price is my second criterion, then quality, and finally site design and navigation.
Update schedule is not a criterion. If it's a site with good stuff that is new to me, even without updates I'll sign up to drain off the content.
|
10-04-08 09:53am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
Damn near all of The above. As everyone knows, there websites Where U cannot download anything. That Sucks! Everyone knows how I feel about crappy material being put in content. Everyone knows they are not gonna pay high prices for websites that suck like a vacuum cleaner!! And it's real real nice to be able to find what you are looking for in a website with good navigation, Real Nice!! You won't have to put out an APB for some website sex... Fuck man!
|
10-04-08 10:14am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
pat362 (0)
|
Quality of content is number one. My next choice is the ability to downlaod unless it's a streaming video site only(like AEBN or Hot Movies). I only join sites that allow downloads without DRM's.
|
10-04-08 06:45pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I rank them this way:
1. Quality of content
2. Ability to download
3. Price
4. Update schedule
5. Navigation
6. Design
Attractive design is nice, but you might know of a restaurant that looks like a dive but has great food. Some porn sites are like that, which is OK. After all, it's what you leave with that counts the most: the quality.
If you can download with ease, even if the navigation is less than robust or error-free (e.g., wrong model name), then at least you can get the content.
Price and update schedule could be switched in my list; they're the two sides of a single transaction.
To me, sites like Watch 4 Beauty and MC Nudes have it backwards. High price ($29.95) for photos that are too often dark, blurry, grainy and uninteresting with the girl looking away too often. They do have nice pic sizes, and zips, but a visually incoherent mess at 5000px is not welcome on my hard drive.
So do sites that cut back on their updates in order to put more capital expenditure into the design of the site, like TorridArt. I mean, it's now 2 "updates" per week, which is really parts 1 and 2 of one shoot and amounts to about 100-150 photos. Not the best call, IMHO. But they do offer a nice trial price these days at least.
|
10-05-08 12:06am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Lionheart (0)
|
All important choices when considering a site, I choose ability to download because I have had some sites where downloading the movie had issues, and what good is the content without being able to watch it
|
10-05-08 01:10am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
nygiants03 (0)
|
Its pretty Unanimous that quality of content is the best answer. It is my answer at well. Although I am a movie guy and I would never join a site that doesn't have any videos to watch. So perhaps ability to download is a major priority. When I join a site its based on quality of videos( except of course when i watch amateur porn in which any quality suffices).
|
10-06-08 09:55pm
Reply To Message
|
