| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
TheRizzo (0)
|
Thanks Denner, that is indeed great news. At that price and with HD now being present for some video that makes this site a great value. It really already was but like you said its now even better.
Maybe I'll check it out again in the new year.
|
11-14-08 09:05pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
wiild1 (Unverified)
|
I agree with almost all of your comments Denner but I am still not convinced about the "HD" or "DVD" quality vids.
They are clearly not DVD quality and not even close to real HD.
|
11-27-08 10:41am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - wiild1 :
Well, wiild1..........after browsing a lot of both new and older material in this last week, I could easyly get different notions, for sure.
One thing I've noticed is that SOME new stuff has the advantage of fine HD or DVD-quality. But the more I scan through a little older stuff - stuff I missed earlier, I tend to agree with you. Here there is no difference in viewing quality if you download a 600Mb "DVD-quality" or you just take the "high" quality at ex. 200 Mb (compared).
That has over the years been the main problem for Videobox - and, alas - still is for quite a lot of download-options.
Still I'm a bit impressed with all the newer studios (like "Private") which Videobox now seems to get in the mix....anyway I've enjoyed my browsing this site more than before.
|
11-27-08 01:47pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
wiild1 (Unverified)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Denner :
Yeah, the "DVD" quality is very uneven. For someone on a budget I would recommend joining the "normal" USD10/month. Problem is that you get reminded the whole time to upgrade and in the end it's hard to resist..."it's only a few dollars more"! :-)
But as you said, browsing around videobox is still very enjoyable. I keep returning.
|
11-28-08 12:46pm
Reply To Message
|
