| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
surferman (0)
|
A guy talking in the background always drives you mad and takes away any spontaniety. If the girl needs to be told what to do while she is playing with hreself, then she shouldn't be there in the first place. Heavens, does she not do it without instructions on her own!
And the same with girl/girl. The whole thing has to be natural otherwise it is no longer erotic. And I would happily help instruct them before the camera starts rolling!!!
|
12-15-08 12:25am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Lionheart (0)
|
I hate when there is a guy talking in back, kills the solo aspect of the movie. I want to see and hear the girl not the director
|
12-15-08 01:30am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I go for the solo vids, not the lez. I also usually view with the sound off. But bad angles are really irritating, along with the rest: overly long closeups, bad lighting, and "sight-bite" editing. (Gee, did I just coin a term?)
It really makes me appreciate what an art it is to make a good video. There's definitely too much crap out there. (Well, that's news, isn't it?)
|
12-15-08 01:38am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
williamj (0)
|
Excellent pole, every choice is an annoyance. But the clicking of the camera and movement kills me. Usually that means poor lighting and ankles and overall poor production. A guys JO voice is on the top of the list too. One other annoyance that is not on the list: dry vagina…no real visible arousal.
|
12-15-08 05:20am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
elonlybuster (0)
|
The guy talking is annoying but the bad camera angles are worse. I've seen a few movies where the camera was glued on the girl's face and you had no clue what was going on unless they were changing positions.
|
12-15-08 05:33am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
rabble (Suspended)
|
The only thing that improves a lesbian solo is more lesbians.
|
12-15-08 07:19am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
The clicking of cameras takes away from the fantasy of a certain intimacy with the model. But talking in the background is bad, too. I especially hate it when I hear the cameraman give whispered instructions. Three cheers for pictures! :-)
|
12-15-08 07:39am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - messmer :
"I especially hate it when I hear the cameraman give whispered instructions. Three cheers for pictures! :-)"
You said it. Pics don't come with a soundtrack, and maybe that's just as well ...
For fun, I suppose one could cue a vid to the worst background blabbering, then open a photoset in a viewer on top of the vid, and "enjoy."
|
12-15-08 08:09am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Monahan (0)
|
Background chatter sucks. The video is about the baabe so if she needs instructions, fine. Edit out the chatter for Pete's sake.
Shutter sounds also suck, especially when it's so damned easy to shoot silently with modern equipment.
Poor lighting is crazy. The babe(s) is/are paid good money to show off their assets so why not light those assets properly?
But the one thing that annoys the shit out of me is when the camera man lingers far too long on, say, a solo masturbation scene. Two minutes is plenty, but seven or eight minutes where the last 30 seconds are the same as the first 30 seconds? What's the point?
|
12-15-08 09:03am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #9 - Monahan :
I think two minutes is plenty when it comes to everything they do. That's my constant beef .. it's all too dragged out and after a while you start fast forwarding to get to the next act because whatever they happen to be doing has become boring. I've been blaming my age but maybe those sex marathons are boring to the young as well.
|
12-15-08 10:19am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Drooler :
LOL. Might convert a lot of video lovers to a fondness for pictures! Or maybe not!
|
12-15-08 10:22am
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #10 - messmer :
I'm not that young and I agree with your 2 minutes as an absolute maximum for any activity. Given the impatience of the younger folks these days, I doubt they would differ from a 2 minute benchmark except perhaps to say it should be closer to a minute or so.
It kinda reminds me of the good old days a quarter century ago sitting in the local Pussycat Theater, bored to tears, while Serena, Seka, Aunt Peg or John Leslie would act out a set up scene to create a "plot." Then finally, Leslie yanks out his sausage and a babe would wrap her lips around it and go to work. By and large the porn directors back in those days were smart enough to limit the action but the new guys, I guess, figure that, if a girl takes 15 minutes to get off with a toy, if he has to wait, so do we. ;)
|
12-15-08 01:06pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
pat362 (0)
|
For me it's the camera work because I mostly buy my lesbian porn on dvd's. My studio of choice is Girlfriends Films and here is why. There is no one talking in the background. Every scene has a beginning, middle and end. The girls start with clothes on, and slowly undress. There is amazing kissing. I've even seen the return of bush and did not panic. My only pet peeve is that the camera work could be improved.
|
12-15-08 05:34pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Karupspc was the first site where I laid eyes on Yvette Blanche. They had several nice photosets of her. Then I downloaded a vid. It was of her walking around, with the voice of what sounded like this middle-aged guy barking orders at her in what was probably Hungarian. He'd bark, she'd kind of sulk and then change position. On it went. And she had these heels on, which would make a lot of noise with every step because the floor was wood and the room didn't have much soundproofing. "Bark! (Sulk) CLOP-CLOP." It was very weird. I wondered what the whole point was of posting that on a paysite.
|
12-16-08 04:40am
Reply To Message
|
15
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #13 - pat362 :
Pat makes a great point I can not think of hardly any in my collection of lez where a guy is talking unless its leading to a BJ later i dont hear it.
BUT THE GUY TALKING, is my pet peave of all times, its gotten to where I avoid the sites now that are cronic about this.
|
12-16-08 09:29am
Reply To Message
|
16
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #15 - Cybertoad :
A lot of stupid guys scrape together the money, get themselves a video camera and go into the business for themselves.
Beginning of dialogue of a scene I watched yesterday (forgot real names. Keep in mind that it is essential that the guy always barks:
"What's your name?"
"Lilly Love"
"How old are you?"
"Nineteen"
"Where are you from?"
"Detroit"
"How old are you?"
Baffled look by model: "Nineteen?"
Camera man covers up his embarrassment by barking even louder: "Get up and let's see your tits!"
And that's supposed to turn me on? What do you think is the percentage of DVDs exactly like this one found on Videobox? 10%, 20%, 50%, 80%?
And stupid people like me keep subscribing hoping to find something different. Go figure!
|
12-16-08 11:58am
Reply To Message
|
17
|
Jeffrey99 (0)
|
My number one has to be dumbass guys talking in the background. I don't mind it too much on some sites like FTV where most of the talking is more of a interview kinda thing. But I hate the cameraman telling the girls exactly what to do.
My 2nd would have to be the camera snapping away. Mainly just because it normally follows a 3,2,1 or the guy telling the model how to pose.
|
12-16-08 01:01pm
Reply To Message
|
18
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #16 - messmer :
You left out another set of lame questions...
When did you first have sex?
Fourteen
Who was it with?
My boyfriend.
How was it
It was fun
If they would, just once, have followups.
Q. When did you first have sex?
A. Fourteen
Q. Who was it with?
A. My boyfriend.
Q. How old was he?
A. Twenty two
Q. Hang on a second. Operator, please put me in touch with the police.
Q. Police? I'd like to report a statutory rape.
Q. Yes, I have the victim right here.
|
12-16-08 04:31pm
Reply To Message
|
19
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #18 - Monahan :
Yep, those are always the questions that follow, except for your follow-up ones! British videos sometimes have flashes of humor in them and they are much more casual and imaginative in their approach, Japanese videos show some variation from one to the other .. but the American produced ones .. arghh! Every category follows the same basic formula, only the models change. The Porn industry is in the hands of a bunch of immature, uncouth, loudmouthed wannabes.
|
12-16-08 06:12pm
Reply To Message
|
20
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #15 - Cybertoad :
I don't know if I'm lucky or that I never join certain sites, but I cannot remember the last time I was a member of a site where the director or whomever was talking during a scene. I must be lucky because that would drive me nuts as well.
|
12-16-08 06:33pm
Reply To Message
|
21
|
nygiants03 (0)
|
The one that annoys me most in not on there. Its when the girl/girls are faking it, and I can usually tell. I hate fake moans and groans, its a turn off.
|
01-05-09 01:07pm
Reply To Message
|
22
|
Pornjackker (0)
|
My only gripe with lesbian porn is that it exists
in every hardcore site you sign up with. I just
don't like it.
|
01-12-09 05:49pm
Reply To Message
|
