Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

18 Closeup (0)

Newbie 69* williamj (0) 12-12-08  06:11pm          TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: •18 CloseUp is a niche site themed at CloseUp erotica of the female vagina and anus. The site keeps true to the fetish that their trying to offer to a niche market. It’s a newbie site and they need to keep working at it but they have the right theme and focus. •HD for the very latest videos. •Models are improving in xxx role Cons: •Much smaller site than what I expected. I should have known with just 30 models not to expect a big site. Members can pretty much download the site in a few evenings without a download manager. The HD files are small. I downloaded clips pretty fast. Don’t ask me speeds but it’s a minute to three per download. •The site sold me on the preview menu and initial marketing. Plus the TBP Reviews. The site did a good job on fluffing the selling pitch rather well if they got me to join. I feel short changed. •HD Video? The way they reviewed the videos on TBP you would have thought they had the very best in industries standards in HD technology. TBP Reviewer’s compared them to IntheCrack? Not even close in video quality or level of erotica. A few HD but a majority was lesser quality. I thought their HD videos quality was not even close to what I’ve been seeing on other up-close sites that have been around for a long time. Even with the option of $29.95 HD membership. Bottom Line: •The Zip Files of the actual screen shoots are poor. •Navigation? 2 out of 10 in the modern web site design. Area that needs direction as they grow to make the site much better. •Weekly Updates. I wish the site would just update one model instead of updating clips of 4-5 models from sometime ago. With today standards for adult internet sites asking for one complete model a week is not that much to ask for? •One lezzie set. Just one and its not even close to Sapphic Erotica quality. •This con is one that drives me crazy. The camera person is a male ape with a retard IQ or a maybe a horny bull dyke bimbo getting off seeing pussy. If I had to hear those video cams click and unclick and the cam JO making a racket with that cam I was going to scream. Whatever the fuck the dummy camera JO was doing with constant movement distraction over and over in some of the clips I have no idea. This site needs to get a professional camera person if it wants to improve. The current cam people are terrible. They take away so much of the site. •This is a con is for other sites too. Shaved Pussy? Shave it bald! More and more I’m seeing newbie models that just walked onto a porno set ( which this site seems to have for a first time shoot) that are not ready. Oh their horny whore sluts for sure wanting to spread their cunt and finger themselves! It’s becoming obvious the girls where hairy maybe before the shoot and shaved or they haven’t been working much and they let their cunts grow in. The shoot requires they shave their pussy. To my liking. Their cunt’s on the site looked just shaved all red and with razor burn. I’m fine with that! In fact I like it. The site wants the girls cunt shaved all around the ass and cunt opening for visual fetish which is what should be part of the production. My issue is the girls are spreading their ass and cunt but there is a lot of missed hair and razor stubble which is a total turn off. Is it too much to ask for a real bald cunt? Can’t anyone kneel down and spread an ass to see it the girl was totally ready? Their porno models fee usually consist of prepping the girl? Why sites can’t get this simple thing right will continue to amaze me. ALS is one of a few that get it right. Call them if you need instructions. Inspect the cunt please and make sure it’s clean shaved! • More Lube! Not every girl is going to get naturally wet during a video. Viewers want to see wet cunt pure and simple. If the model is not getting wet help her out. Lube is cheap. Lube the cunt heavy. It makes for much more better erotica. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (2) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 mbaya (Disabled) I am very corious how it compares to Inthecrack in overall quality. Is there a fiar comparison here? 12-15-08  04:07pm Reply To Message 2 williamj (0) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya : Not even close to IntheCrack in video quality, production quality, locations, xxx erotica, navigation, models, etc... Maybe in time but not right know. 12-17-08  09:46am Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.