ALS Angels (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Photos: low res: 1600x1000 900x1400 High res: 3000x2000 3500x2300 1900x2700 2200x3300
Individual photo sets generally range from 80 to 100 pictures.
Presently 74 models in 358 photo sets.
Videos: DIVX @ 320x240 in full or in clips
Windows Media @ 640x480 w/newer at 720x540
Presently 96 videos on site: new release, bonus DVD, and directors choice.
Videos typically range from 12 to 30 minutes.
Updates of at least 2 videos and 1 photoshoot/wk.
No download limit and no DRM. |
| Cons: |
Front members page is a bit of a bandwidth hog.
358 thumbs on that page requires approximately 8MB to download. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a little perplexed why the owners of ALSScan put up a similar site such as ALSAngels. But, after going through the content, I've found some distinguishing factors. It's the models. Yes, (as with ALSScan) the women are lovely and obviously enjoy themselves. And, yes, there are no pubes, artificially augmented breasts, penises or stretch marks. And, yes, there are, toys, fisting, fingers, tongues, smiles, a little peeing, and orgasms in a variety of indoor and outdoor scenes, all served up in original content. But, the more voluptuous models with whom the staff at ALS have worked will appear on ALSAngels. And, by voluptuous, I don't mean rubenesque. Think of women like Sandra Shine and Eve Angel, instead.
Judging by the thumbs of the photoshoots, you might think there's almost no girl-girl on the site. But, approximately 20% of the videos feature girl-on-girl or girl-assisting-girl interactions. And they do it better than any site who's initials appear on the compass rose.
Few of the women who've appeared on the ALSScan site appear ALSAngels. And, after browsing both sites, I've yet to find any duplicated content. Given the production values of excellent clarity, lighting, framing, volume levels, no banners or watermarks in the videos, and no spam or pop-ups on the website, ALSAngels presents their product with the same concern for quality of the viewing experience as demonstrated on the ALSScan website, but with a slightly different focus (no pun intended...). |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
