Comment Replies (7)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
We might as well throw in JustTeenSite, Stunners, and Euro Pornstars, and the list probably doesn't end there.
I've gotten to the point where I'll go to TeenDreams and Twistys for their exclusive content, knowing that I'll have to pass over stuff I've seen from some of the other sites.
Babelicious is sometimes OK because their pic sizes are larger and the same goes for Euro Pornstars and JustTeenSite. And Stunners tends to have really high quality pics. But I don't sign up for these sites very often.
So it's a matter of picking one or two sites that you like, and saying to heck the rest for the most part, IMHO.
And as for the watermarks, I guess that's one reason why I don't like Karupspc -- they get on the models there too much.
Anymore, claims made by sites of being "exclusive" are just noise to me. I'm my own judge of that aspect, period.
|
02-21-09 03:09am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
exotics4me (0)
|
Depending on how much Eve Angel content you have, Teen Dreams also has several sites from her own site that they list as exclusive! Sadly, her site also lists them as exclusive. One of the top of my head is the one in a kitchen, it is on both sites as exclusive and some of the Eve videos are also from the official Eve Angel site.
I mention this just on the heels of another member here PinkPanther, telling me that Teen Dreams has content of a model named Sara on Teen Dreams, but listed as Sasha on Babelicious and Babelicious, lists her content as exclusive to their site, but it is the same content that Teen Dreams has. It gets confusing to say the least. One thing I have noticed a lot of sites doing is the "exclusive to this site's network", Teen Dreams has a Teen Dreams network that says it is exclusive content of 10 or 11 models, but nearly all of the content comes from Teen Dreams. Confusing indeed, not really drama queening at all, I hate joining sites that make me think I am getting something new only to realize I have it from another site.
|
02-21-09 10:01am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
Generally I certainly agree with with our new fellow PU, ByteMaster.
The definition of the concept: EXCLUSIVE is getting to a point where things seems to be influenced by a still worse economy in the way of experiencing new AND socalled "exclusive" material on a lot of sites.
We're all seeing more and more licensed stuff on TOO many sites. Licensed material may be all right to a certain degree, but in the final aspect it means, that we users join sites where we can risk spending our money twice (or more) for the same stuff...
We've been around this subject before, but since ByteMaster brings it up, I think its a good idea to mention to the site-owners, that this policy is or can be a matter of some sort of inflation - if sites keep up this policy, it'll problably result in loosing a lot of PUs and others as costumers...
|
02-21-09 11:02am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
TheRizzo (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Denner :
I don't mind licensed content of a girl as long as the site also has shoots of her that are exclusive too.
|
02-21-09 03:28pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - TheRizzo :
I agree to some extend (there's fine licensed stuff at Teendreams once in a while) - just getting tired of finding similar stuff on different sites - and that's kind of paying for the same thing more than once..
|
02-21-09 04:00pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Denner :
Another,further thing that's bothersome about all of the licensed stuff is that, to avoid duplications, you have to check your personal porn stash to see if you've already got something -- if you can't recognize it as such.
Here's an example: There's a set of Trisha Brill that I first saw on one site. I was very positively impressed by her and her poses, but the pics were only 1200's. I didn't realize that the same thing was going to show at Euro Pornstars, which it eventually did with 3500px, but without my favorite pic of the bunch. Months later still, it shows up at Twistys in 1600 px, with my favorite pic.
So I've got stuff of that set from three different sources!
And then there are the real surprises. Yesterday at 1byday there was a set of Luciana (she has a different name at 1by), a black chick who is just heavenly. I thought it was a redux because it looked familiar, so I got it because I thought my pics were at 1616 with that annoying black border that 1byday used to have.
But no ... it's a reposting of a set that I'd already gotten at 2000px. So it was a waste of my time and money.
I really don't plan to return to 1byday in quite a while once my current 1-year subscription ends. It's weird because although the site is certainly better than it was 2 years ago, I get disappointed too often now. Must be that my tastes have narrowed, for one thing.
|
02-22-09 03:36am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Drooler :
Drooler, I guess it's the shower-scene with Luciana at 1by your're talking about.
And what I recollect is that the scene with Luciana from january 22 (the lingeri-set) is about the same.
Concerning "replays", "reediting" or whatever at 1by, I got the same notion at the moment - never thought that this site would get tiresome..
Ending my membership this term - and sure, I got the same thing here: It'll take a while before returning...
And, alas - the same goes for Teendreams.
Found some rather special stuff on some british site I'd asked Khan to put on TBP - for a later review. It's mostly with some wellknown ( in Europe anyway) uk-models from the 1990th...WELL, at least it's something new even if it's ten og 15 years old... be back..
Denner
|
02-22-09 05:53am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
