Comment Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
King (0)
|
The will disappear like dinosaurs if they will stop providing content. Nothing to worry about, same girls can be found at pixandvideo and many other sites. Thanks for the info. I was close to join once but glad i didn't.
|
04-28-07 12:29pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
DivBZero (Suspended)
|
Actually I agree with this. Superglam has some great content, beautifully posed and well worth collecting.
But it is madness to add 10 pics per day to existing sets *THEN* zip them up. The member has no idea where they are, and as a work of art it just doesn't work. Picture sets are about progression and culminations, not a daily edging forward.
Either do it properly in the first place or accept that memberships will not be renewed.
|
04-29-07 02:05pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - DivBZero :
Definitely agree. Piecemealing out a gallery over weeks is absurd. MetArt actually used to do it over MONTHS, but they finally must've realized how foolish that was. It was like, geology in action.
SuperGlam seems way out of touch. I just visited again, and what they have as stated size links are 1000 (actually 750), 2000 (actually 1000), and 4000 (actually 1536). They should be in politics, not porn.
Currently they have 47 models with roughly 4 sets per, about 188 galleries. If their masters are at least 6 megapixels, they could post the 3000px shots right away. (They'd need 12mpx masters to do 4000s). They might want to add their top logo, but that could be done in a batch mode over no more than a week, certainly, with just a couple of techies doing the work at a leisurely pace.
Thanks, DivBZero, for your reply. I know others might read, so I've put in the above for a little more info and perspective.
|
04-29-07 04:57pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
