Brain Pass (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Supports download managers.
-Newest videos are 720x480, 2750kbps.
-No DRM or download restrictions.
-Easy navigation and search from the network site.
-Very big, you can even call it huge. I didn't see any numbers about exactly how much. |
| Cons: |
-Many videos are clips only, with no whole movie downloads. No streaming option. Newest videos do have whole video downloads.
-States that all material is exclusive. See my review of the silverstonedvd.com site which has many of the same videos. I would love to hear an explanation.
-Updates are not dated. When looking at a site, you don't know how often you will get new material. The network has a listing of upcoming updates though. Most upcoming updates go to pornstarnetwork, another name for the brainpass network, not any individual site within the network.
-States voted best adult network. Takes the comment "Definitely one of my favorite networks out there for the exclusive content and great-looking sites" from Spencers review, then states the score was 10/10. Spencer gave it a 90.0. I didn't see any review by TBP that was 10/10.
I would really love to hear an explanation. |
| Bottom Line: |
I see a lot of high scoring reviews, but my feelings about the network are more like Denner's than any other reviewer. There are a lot of sites, but many could easily be combined as they are about the same topic. Take silverstonevideo. The latest updates are on another site iwantlatina. There are several sites that are basically dead and have not updated in years. My impression of the videos is that although they have some interesting niches, such as tiny asses, you feel that you have seen all of this before. On the network a LOT of the material, maybe half overall, is not even from this decade. The navigation is simple and I really like the network's ability to search. However, within each site you cannot; there isn't even a list of the models. While many of the models are attractive, they are not so outstanding as to be a significant plus because many other video sites do as well or better. Overall this network is about quantity, not creativity. I didn't feel any of the individual sites was all that outstanding. I would even go further and say that many were below the levels of their competitions' comparable sites. While many videos had very good quality, I saw no HD or DVD level material on even the newest updates. The best you get is 720x480 2750 kbps. Nice, but not cutting edge. By the way, a nice plus is that the network does have lots of updates daily. Today there are 6 videos. On the other hand I saw not even one site that had outstanding quality photos-just screencaps. If you are a fan of Peter North, who has been around for years, or of Lexington Steele, who has also been around for years, you will like what they have here. However, does Lexington need 7 sites? Does North need 2? Do you need 7 sites for facial cumshots? My overall impression is that the network needs some new more creative concepts for their sites and better quality videos and photos. A real makeover could make this site much better. Overall I would rate this as an ok network, but not a strongly recommended one. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
