Errotica Archives (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Beautiful Eurobabes most of the time
+Daily updates from August 2005; fewer per month from June 2004
+zip files in 3 sizes (site began with 2000px as "large"; from mid-2006, large is usually 4000px)
+Full length videos in wma, avi, and Quicktime; they look good in full screen mode |
| Cons: |
-Videos are of the photoshoots. While they're not hyper-edited, they tend to be slow and awkward in the motion as you watch the model try different poses. You also see other people (photographer, etc.) in them.
-Incomplete updates are first posted (usually missing the zips); zips are added the same day, though. (A minor complaint, perhaps, but it's not good practice.)
-Lighting is sometimes too dark; sometimes too light. And sometimes blurriness is a problem |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a completely softcore site with NO TOYS. I consider that a plus.
It's also primarily a photo site. A typical month will have 5 videos and 15-16 photosets. The videos are subtitled, so you can brush up on your Czech ;).
I'd definitely recommend it to people who like softcore nude photography. The content buildup and the price of $19.99 a month make it worth it.
You can get a sense of the content by visiting the site and clicking "updates." That's a plus, too. (Wish every site did that.)
With better control of lighting and focus, and fewer of the somewhat boring videos, this site would have gotten a score in the 90's.
Follow-Up:
I've lowered the score from 87 to 81. Gallery thumbs partially "X" out too often; back then fwd buttons needed to fix that. Thumbs are too cropped, not WYSIWYG; must open to see whole pic. Too many pics of models looking away, or just writhing around. Not enough "spark"/errotic appeal, though sometimes there is. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
