| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Monahan (0)
|
Although I'm a video guy, I signed up for Met Art for a few months and was blown away by the volume and quality of the photo content. As zzzins suggests in his review, the videos are not why one signs up...and his comments are why I decided to drop the site altogether.
In photos, I prefer erotic over artsy fartsy, and Met Art does provide some good erotic stuff. But the majority of their material is more of the artsy style. There are no men in any of their material at all, no overt pussy or tit play, no insertions, but tons of gorgeous babes of all shapes, sizes and sexiness.
One other point. If you see a babe you'd like to see more of, you'll be frustrated because the site uses just first names and in more than one case the names they use are totally different than those used in other sites.
|
05-10-09 05:24pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :
Yep - all true. If you enjoy softer nude stuff well-presented with gorgeous babes - updated daily, this sites's pretty awesome.
If you're looking for boy/girl stuff or harder solo stuff, this site will frustrate the hell out of you.
I would highly recommend Nubiles.net for people that are frustrated by Met Art but like the type of girls that they post. Nubiles.net also has multiple updates a day, lots of great HQ masturbations vids, some boy/girl vids - and you can be delighted to find girls that went on to be notable porn babes who did great stuff here early in their careers.
|
05-10-09 06:04pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - PinkPanther :
I hear you, Nubiles is on my short list to replace a site that I eventually tire of.
Interesting side note that shows you are definitely on target...Nubiles has a check box on their signup page for...yup...MetArt. (Unless you uncheck it you get a $2.99 trial followed by a full membership at $29.99.
|
05-10-09 06:56pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Jeffrey99 (0)
|
Nice review. I've always wanted to give this site a try but I'm just wondering, do they start the photo sets off already nude? Or are they clothed at the beginning and then strip to full nude?
That was one thing that killed me about FemJoy, was that 90% of the gallerys the model was already full nude at the start. To me just kinda makes all the photos run together. So was just wondering if that's the way it is here?
|
05-10-09 08:20pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - PinkPanther :
> If you enjoy softer nude stuff well-presented with gorgeous babes - updated daily, this sites's pretty awesome.
Do you mind if I amend it a bit? "If you enjoy softer nude stuff well-presented with gorgeous babes WITH BORED "I'M THE QUEEN AND YOU'RE DIRT" EXPRESSION CLEARLY WRITTEN ON THEIR FACES" - updated daily, this sites's pretty awesome." would be MUCH better description IMHO :-).
|
05-10-09 10:33pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
zzzins (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Jeffrey99 :
I'ts a bit of a mix. I'd say 8 out of 10 sets start off fully clothed and gradually strip. On average about 40% of a set of photos will be totally naked and most get progressively more explicit - although none get to spread pussy shots.
|
05-11-09 02:00am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
zzzins (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :
Totally agree Monahan. I'm a video guy too but joined MetArt because the photos are just so damn good. I see the video content on MetArt as a bit of a bonus really - not why I joined but occasionally nice to have a vid of a girl you've been admiring the photos of. Uma B was a good example for me - major hot babe with about 5 photo sets and all of a suddden 2 or 3 vids appeared - a nice addition.
I agree with you regarding the model names but at least the names are unique. I'm currently writing a database/website to act as a central model "lookup" for as many popular websites as possible and will let the PU community know as soon as I have a beta sit ready to test.
|
05-11-09 02:05am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Jeffrey99 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - zzzins :
Thanks for the reply. It looks like Met Art is atop my list of sites to try soon.
|
05-11-09 05:51am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
As some have mentioned, this site is definitely more on the artsy side rather than the erotic. If Met-Art branched out and did some shoots with toys and actual lesbianism it would score out at a 98 on a review for me. While the girls are amazing and there's tons to see it's just a tad too softcore for my long term viewing tastes despite my love of pictures over videos.
|
05-11-09 11:41am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
nutcrackr (0)
|
Good review, I personally see the lack of explicit content as a pro as it keeps the standard pretty high. But that's just personal preference. Of course I agree that some of the recent vids have been sadly of photoshoots with the camera clicking and people talking in the background which is really unappealing - only Erro pulls this off. Really disappointing, when I look back years at some movies I see some quite good ones, but movies aren't the main thing here anyway. And yes download manager support is very good although others sites I use (hegre, met models and errotica archives) also support dl managers.
|
05-27-09 02:41am
Reply To Message
|
