Comment Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I'd to toss in a couple of things as well.
First, for a site this expensive, 3000 pixel photos should be standard for every photo gallery -- not some occasional "best selection" deal. (At least the newer pics since some time last year are 1600 pixels.)
Second, they should format their pages so that if you're viewing at 1024x768, the pages don't extend past the right side of the viewing area of the monitor. This is one of the few sites that still doesn't code well for a variety of screen resolutions.
|
07-26-09 07:50am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Jeffrey99 (0)
|
I agree 100% with what both of you said. While I love the videos style and quality, the pics and website design/navigation could really use some work. Overall a good site, unfortunately too many flaws in my eyes for $30 a month, $20 maybe but not today for me at $30.
|
07-26-09 04:08pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
FTV Staff (0)
Webmaster
|
The coverpages aren't just to be 'pretty', but actually have function. Those subtitles are all hyperlinks to the sets, unlike other coverpage sites.
A search function has been implemented in the model directory, and the model directories themselves have all been upgraded.
|
01-03-10 02:48pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
