Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
Sometimes, those feeds or pop ups get on my nerves!! I think they do that on purpose to break your concentration!! It's not the women in them that bother me, but the men that create these nuisance pop up feeds and the content sometimes suck!!
On the other hand, if a pop up feed has what I like in regards to everything I keep on complaining about, I will view it with no problem!!
|
05-29-07 09:58am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
troglodite (Suspended)
|
Feeds were good when I first started joining porn sites. Now I've seen most of them and come to my own determination that there's usually not much I want to see. They're usually streaming only, heavily fragmented into 1 minute clips, incredibly slow, or difficult to navigate, or sometimes all of the above.
On the other hand - I do like seeing the "Teens For Cash" sites included as extras. They share a lot of those negative qualities I just mentioned, but I like em anyways!
|
05-29-07 03:41pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I'm with troglodite on this one. Feeds were better back in the day. I remember when Bubblegirls and SoCalGirls (Gals?) were feeds to Karupspc, so they were nice bonuses -- FOR THE TIME. (Of course, that was also in the age of dial-up, Pentium 3, and runty RAM and storage. Not to mention crappy/small pics.)
But these days, the term "feeds" is about as impressive as "free gift" from some 3 a.m. TV offer.
There ARE a few notable exceptions, but exceptions they are.
|
05-29-07 04:10pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
DpornGuy (Suspended)
|
i agree that most of the feeds around show the same low quality clips that were around years ago... back then they were cool but now, if it's not downloadable and high quality in terms of picture.. well.. what's the point? add to the fact that 90% of those feeds never update and basically it's a feature that's not really going to sway me into purchasing a membership.
|
05-29-07 05:19pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
littlejoe (0)
|
i love extra feeds but i dont think in any way should they be considered site content. hense EXTRA
|
05-29-07 05:26pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
There are sites that are part of a network and that bonus content is definitely part of the value of the membership to me - but the "feed" bonuses are generally crap and I always feel that I'm risking viruses whenever I click on them, so I stay the hell away from them these days.
|
05-29-07 10:13pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Pornjackker (0)
|
Feeds can only be streamed and not downloaded
and are a waste of bandwidth. Plus, usually
the content is pretty general and not worth
watching.
|
05-30-07 01:35am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Gazette Risque (0)
|
I have only found one good feed, which is actually a feed that can be accessed for free through another website.
So I have yet to find some good Bonus Feeds.
|
06-02-07 10:11am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Schnitzel (0)
|
I tend to ignore the feed content. It's not what I've joined the site to see, and for the most part it's of questionable quality.
Sure, if I filtered through it all I'm sure I'd find some nice stuff, but there's enough of that in the main content of the site I'd joined anyway.
|
07-12-07 03:47pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Homegirl (Disabled)
|
Bonus content makes a site a better value.
|
05-30-20 07:08am
Reply To Message
|