Girls Out West (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site has a lot of content on it with a lot of pretty women. One thing that I do like is that these are 'real' girls and not pornstars. Real breasts and pubic hair are very much present. The videos aren't slick, but they are fun. This site is like watching real people get naked, real people have sex, etc.
One thing that really is nice is that in all my looking (and I'm not done) I haven't seen one facial. I'm finding facials increasingly lame and their absence is nice. |
| Cons: |
I'd be happier if there was a bit more boy/girl content.
While I like natural, 'regular' girls on a site, some of the girls aren't even remotely attractive.
The videos are not slick and are almost crude in their style. Very much an amateur production. For me, this is good, but it may be a turn off to many. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is Abby Winters less beautiful sister. She's pretty and a lot of fun but not as beautiful as her sister Abby. Whereas Abby Winters site is slick and very polished, Girls Out West is much more of an amateur site.
However, I found this to be endearing. I think Abby's is a great site, one of the best, but it almost takes itself too seriously. GOW is just a lot of fun, pretty, naked, natural average girls. I like it a lot.
I'm almost a hypocrite in saying this. I do like porn---but sometimes I get tired of the slickness, the fake breasts, the fake moaning, shaved pussies, and facials.
This site is sort of the anti-porn site. No silicon, lots of pubic hair, no facials, cum shots that actually take place where they usually take place. If you love slick porn and love facials and love seeing porn stars in action, this may not be the site for you. If you want to see pretty but regular girls doing what they do, this is a really good site. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
