Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Nick Spillum (0) Webmaster
|
Hi Drooler,
You're right, we are still offering 1280px size photos - we have focussed a lot more on video with this release of the web site.
We'll re-look at the picture sizes in the future though.
|
10-29-09 06:15am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Nick Spillum :
That would be great. 2000 pixels or higher would be very nice. I really like the photography work of Viv Thomas. It should "live large," so to speak.
|
10-29-09 12:19pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Nick Spillum (0) Webmaster
|
Hi Drooler,
Not sure if you noticed but a while back we started offering 2400px on all new sets.
Cheers,
Nick
|
03-30-10 06:17am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Nick Spillum :
OK. Thanks. I think that's a great move for your site.
Any chance that earlier material could be brought up to the 2400px standard? Sorry if I sound impossible to satisfy, but the Viv Thomas stuff is really good, and if you have larger originals anyway, why not? I'm thinking especially girls like Sandy (Zsanett Egerhazi), Mia Stone, Eve Angel, Sophie Moone, Nicky Case, Peaches ...
|
03-30-10 09:27am
Reply To Message
|