| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I remember the '90's. I even have an old, faded copy of the Whole Internet User's Guide & Catalogue, published in '92.
Exaggeration does not lend itself to credibility.
|
12-08-09 07:08pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Denner (0)
|
Well, well, well: 'A shitload of naked girls' a bit heavy there...
MetArt MAY be a bit overrated in score at TBP in some ways - but it's still a site who comes up with great amounts of entirely exclusive photosets of great - mostly great - euro/easteuro girls - you cannot take that away from them - og what are we here for - but 'naked girls'....ect.
Always had the main complaint: boring videos - but that's almost a historic fact - so skip those as a reason to join.
|
12-09-09 08:28am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
propaGhandi (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Denner :
Yes, 'A shitload of naked girls' is a bit heavy there ...
But MetArt is definately overrated in score at TBP and adrenalinrush is right - sets and videos are really boring here.
|
12-09-09 01:59pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
adrenalinrush (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Denner :
I've just joined MET (1 month only and it will be my last one forever!) because of this discussion.
Ok, naked girls might be a reason to join the site BUT after all MET does not stand the standards of today!
Compared to other sites the images are always mid or just low resolution, you can kick 3/5 of there archive because the images often over-sharpened, blurry or just plain boring.
In the galleries the browsing experience sucks. It's like the Ugh-factor is hitting me like a stone. Who the hell is still using the popup feature from the Stone Age? I don't want to use my browser's back button over and over again anymore.
MET finally has 3-5 top photographers that kept my head up but that's it :/
And something I nearly forgot, I never felt to be welcome in the memberzone. It's plain black and dreary and has additional promotion of other sites and that's something I can't accept as a paying customer!
|
12-13-09 12:00pm
Reply To Message
|
