| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
Nice and fair review, mbaya. I only disagree with the point you made re. unattractive models. I found ninety percent of them gorgeous. But that boils down to personal taste, doesn't it. I do agree about the lack of variety when it comes to race and appearance but am willing to give it time, it is a new site and the webmaster promised us more variety down the road, as he did in connection with more teasing, stripping. I am glad you brought up that point because both cap'n and I have been after him regarding that subject till he must be sick of hearing about it and he promised to cater more to the wishes of those who prefer a bit more of a tease in the future. The addition of your voice will be very helpful.
|
02-21-10 10:00am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - messmer :
Attractiveness is most definitely a matter of taste. But it can't hurt to ask for better looking models. If you don't ask you have no one to blame but yourself. I know the webmaster reads our input and there is room for improvement in the site.
|
02-21-10 10:06am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :
Yep, that's how I feel too. If you don't like something speak up. :-)
In any case, well done. It WAS a good review. We did differ in our scores but since I felt the site, as new as it was, surpassed ATK Natural and Hairy because of ATK's lousy video quality I thought it was only fair to give it a high mark for the hairy niche.
|
02-21-10 10:24am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Capn (0)
|
There is something of a change of direction in the works which may well address some if not all of your concerns.
Well, maybe not as strong as that more a course adjustment! ;0)
New photographers should be coming on stream with more focussed instruction.
I am giving the forum there my best shots, but do need more participants to get some conversation & exchange of views going.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-21-10 12:03pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Studies that show there are universal standards of beauty notwithstanding, it's true that attractiveness is at least somewhat in the eye of the beholder. I'm more with Mbaya on this. I'd like to see more models that are natural (sans "tats") and frankly healthier looking, if I may say so myself. Girls that are cute, fresh and bubbly like Lena (forgot her name at this site).
And I'm soooooooo, sooooooo, SOOOOOOOO tired of toy play! ENOUGH!! STOP THE INJECTION MOULDS! Fairly slow stripping and inviting Drooler to have some real fun would be a hell of a lot better.
Funny how I can say all of this without having joined the site. That's thanks to the fabulous site tour. You can see thumbs of all the galleries.
And I'm sure I'll join some time, anyway.
|
02-21-10 05:02pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Drooler :
The Cap'n and I have been asking for fairly slow stripping from the moment we joined, Drooler. It's supposed to be in the works. And I so agree about toy play. I started a thread on that very subject at their forum today without having read your remarks. I'm glad you made them because I mentioned to the webmaster that most members of this forum were against toys. This backs up what I wrote nicely.
|
02-22-10 02:16pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #6 - messmer :
Right on! Right on! There's enough plastic crap in this world already. Why go to the extreme of sticking it in a woman's woo-woo?
|
02-22-10 03:25pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Basil (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Drooler :
As I said on the forum there will much less toys from now on, around 1-2 per model, just give it a time to get new content ;)
Basil
|
03-09-10 08:41pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Basil :
Thanks. I've been lurking. Will probably make "the lurch" soon enough. ;)
|
03-10-10 01:53pm
Reply To Message
|
