| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
DRM would be a new thing for these guys because they didn't have it in the past. Of course the bigger problem is that all the sites owned by this company are dead and have been since last year. Don't be fooled by the sites claim of latest update. I was a repeat member of strapon lesbians and the last time I joined the site in 09, I found that things had degenerated badly. You had to log on for each video. You did not get a full new scene each week. It's really too bad because I still think that what they offered was really good and was not available anywhere else.
|
05-24-10 08:15am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
Pat,
I appreciate you excellent information. I was tempted to join the site for the "multiple girls watching a spanking" stuff, but then came the DRM just in time to stop me.
There are so many interesting spanking sites out there at reasonable prices; I don't want to waste my time with poor quality DRM or even free poor quality "tube" sites. In the 1980's or 1990's I might have been interested, but not now.
|
05-24-10 08:49am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Jay G :
Since my info on these sites is almost a year old. I can't be sure if they won't change their mind about DRM. If and when they do then you might want to give them a try. The content may not be recent but they should have a fairly good library. I hope this strick still works. I know that when I used to join Strapon lesbian. There was a truck to get a ful membership for under 20$. You would go to the join page and fill out all the info but not click accept. Instead you press the back button all the while holding the control button down so that you can get a special join page where the price was only 18.95$. If it weren't for that. I don't think I'd have ever joined them because 30$ is just too much money for a single site
|
05-24-10 09:06am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Capn (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :
What a load of 'Hoop La' to have to go through, Pat. :0(
I am intrigued by how on Earth you discovered it though. :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-10 10:22am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Capn :
I'm not sure how I found out but I think it's because some sites used to offer a special price for those that had gone through the join page but hadn't actually joined. I suspect that they thought that it's better to get a customer with a lower join amount than no customer at all. It borders on the less than honest approach to getting new customer since that special price should be available upfront but I never complained since it saved me some serious money.
I still try it with some sites to see if they might offer a lower join amount.
|
05-24-10 06:24pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Capn (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :
I think you can lump that in with the practice of only offering a discounted rate when you go to cancel.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-24-10 10:31pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :
Thanks for the info! It is much appreciated.
|
05-25-10 02:21am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Capn :
I agree but can you imagine the number of extra members they might have had if they'd offered the 18.95$ amount upfront instead of this reatrded way? I believe they would still be in business if they had gobe that route.
|
05-25-10 06:32pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Capn (0)
|
REPLY TO #8 - pat362 :
You are probably right.
That slightly underhand practice sort of backfired on them in that sense.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-26-10 11:37am
Reply To Message
|
