Review Replies (8)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
jd1961 (0)
|
How is this site different from the main site Drooler? Are they using the same photo sets? Are the photos of a different style? Thanks, good review!
|
07-02-07 07:27pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Denner (0)
|
I second that (jd1961): Good review and the question of centent compared to the motherload at MET ART.
I had some serious problems with the boredom of the videos - is the style the same here?
|
09-20-07 06:38am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :
Wow, first my apologies for not answering this for over 2 months. I did say "exclusive" in the review, and exclusive it is. Some of the models and photographers are the same in both MetArt and MetModels, but there is no duplication of content.
I guess there's some difference (but also a good amount of similarity) between the photo content of the two sites. Hard to put my finger on it. There's more of the photographer Magoo on MetModels, it seems. He doctors up a lot of photos to an extent where the model has this unearthly sheen to her skin. He's done it to Cayenne and Adrienn (sp?) aka Laura at ATK Galleria/Kelly at Nubiles, for instance. Makes me think of Mr. Magoo, blindly going through life, wreaking havoc on the world with his misplaced notions.
Anyway, the archive volume is huge. You're a photo fan, if I remember right. If you like Met-Art, the collection at MetModels should keep you busy. You could try the $6.99, full access trial if that's still on, but it's only for 2 days.
|
09-20-07 07:22am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Denner :
Hey Denner,
I just responded to jd1961's question about the photo content. Went at length, but the summary statement is, "Yes, the content is exclusive to MetModels."
As for the videos, they are boring. I've thought about this, having recently sampled some of the stuff at Hegre-Art, too, for my review of it.
Get a pair of people together and they can keep each other occupied, but a single model, along with the director, has to work out ways to keep the video interesting. Just lying around and turning this way and that, staring into space, etc. is boring!!! I've seen very few models who can maintain the turn-on. I must say that Evelyn Lory at her own site is a rare exception; she really does it for me. Helps that her ass is so worthy of devotion and zeal.
Anwyay, I think that a lot of effects like superimposing two stretches of video, transitions, and tight editing are done as a poor substitute for "continuous heat conduction."
To make me happy, the model has to be "videogenic," to coin a term (?) and do POV simulated sex, and the camera has to stay at the right places for good lengths of time. Most softcore solo vids never do such things; they jump around so much that it seems as if they're only good for inducing ADD -- if not ED. So for me at least, they've usually been a waste of time.
Good to hear from you. Hope this wasn't too long.
|
09-20-07 07:41am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
jd1961 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :
Believe it or not, I have been waiting for your answer, so thanks for responding! I was hoping that this site would be more on the erotic side, but i guess not. I have DVD's full of Met-Art material, so I guess I'll pass on this.
|
09-21-07 03:17am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :
Certainly agree with your point about the videos...
A solo-model need to act - and not just lying around - even looking bored.
How do otherwise professional (it seems) people from these sites except the customer to not getting bored as well.
I have that feeling about both Hegre Art and Met...
And compared to my favorite at the moment Pier 999 this other stuff is not worth paying for....
But ok, some of the photos in the two sites mentioned are very nice, and your formost a photo-freak, are you not?
By the way this PU keeps getting better and better - AND take up more and more browsing-time.....
|
09-21-07 07:38am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Denner :
A photo phreak indeed I am. 2nd for me is hot hardcore video, but I'm really picky about the quality and the action. BTW, since you're into videos and I think HC, you might want to check out 1000facials, which is actually part of a network of several sites. I was a member early this year and have occasionally lurked around the newer updates areas.
It's got a $30 price tag and is one of those signups for mostly the existing (but exclusive) content since the updates are a tad slow (for me to get what I'm after, at least). And if you go back far enough in their archives the quality suffers, but it still might be of interest to you, especially with the dollar now at an all-time low against the Euro. The action is hot, and some of the girls are great, too, like Lela Star and Riley Shy.
|
09-22-07 03:18am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :
Well, guess what. Today for the first time I saw a set on MetModels that had already appeared on MetArt, of the thin blond Olga, "Svelte," on MetModels.
I'd picked it up Nov. or Dec. last year from MetArt as Olga R, "Presenting." Same model, same pics.
So I've paid for it twice. How nice!
|
09-27-07 11:47am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
