| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I've also been at a loss to explain the popularity of this site, but some people really go apeshit over it. The way you described it is pretty much how I've always seen it, too.
|
10-02-10 07:26am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
I wouldn't give them 95% nowadays but that's because they split up one site and made three out of it with an increased price if one wants all of them. I disagree with the rest of your remarks, though. If a site features natural girls and then sticks with natural girls they are being true to the niche, which is a plus for me. Just like going to a hardcore site and then complaining that there's too much b/g, g/g content.
|
10-02-10 08:54am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Ergo Proxy (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - messmer :
@ Drooler Nice to see that some others have the same opinion as me.
@Messmer Maybe you are right and it's just not my affair, though I appreciate Lesbian sites with "natural girls" in general. LittleMutt is quite good, though they have cut down on the g/g stuff lately.
|
10-02-10 11:34am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Capn (0)
|
I think it really depends what you are looking for.
I agree perhaps it is not your genre.
They have become very formulaic, which if it appeals might well merit that in some folks eyes.
Not for me though.
Too repetetive & too sprawling a site for a mark over 80, let alone 95.
FWIW That is just my opinion.
|
10-02-10 03:32pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
I definitely don't agree with Spencer's review of the site. The cons he lists don't touch on what seems to be common complaints in user reviews and comments about their content in the last couple (few?) years - mostly the lack of nudity and repetitiveness of the shoots.
While it's still somewhat unique in it's niche, I'd have to rate this as a low 80's site now.
|
10-02-10 04:32pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Capn :
"Sprawling." Now there's a good term to describe a site. I'd use it, for instance, to describe sites that have multiple updates from one shoot "sprawled" over time. Or that have "feature" pics that come from shoots they also publish; think VivThomas and the "Bums" or "Legs" features. You have to work extra hard to get the stuff together! Or a site that's hard to navigate, perhaps.
You might say that they put the user through "content sprawl."
|
10-03-10 04:28am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
miko5 (0)
|
Where the 95 % approval comes from ? Very simple answer, my friend. Abby despite all it's limitations in terms of camera work and some unattractive girls (especially lately ) it is the only lesbian site in the Internet 100% TOYS FREE. It is a fact but g/g video makers don't get it : lesbian porn watchers hate toys.
|
12-06-10 05:52pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
heckles65 (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - miko5 :
I look at Abbywinters and I compare it to FTV. Both have very beautiful women, FTV may even be the better of the two. That's were the similarity ends. AW highlights female sexuality on its own terms, with women posing in their own space in their own clothes; FTV always has the posing done what appears to be rental places in clothes that were -bought for them- the day before. The end result is that AW seem like women you would want to meet and actually could meet; while FTV makes them seem like rich mens' toys without any personality.
|
06-25-12 05:33am
Reply To Message
|
