POV Porn (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good quality POV scenes
- Part of a bigger (but relatively small) network
- Mostly amateur models
- Some porn stars, before they were stars
- Good selection of scenes
- Updates (I’m unsure of the schedule though)
- Pictures (but no zips)
- The scenes aren’t over-produced; they have a ‘fun’ feel to them
- Good value when joining at the TPB / PU price |
| Cons: |
- Download speeds aren’t up to industry standards |
| Bottom Line: |
Two things to start: 1) this review pretty much applies entirely to Peter Girls too. They are part of the same network. POVPorn.com is hardcore-themed, while Peter Girls is more softcore, with some oral and handjobs. 2) I wouldn’t normally submit two reviews for a network, but I joined through Lap Dance Gone Bad which turned out to be just a small secondary network site. POVPorn.com and Peter Girls are the main sites and deserve a separate review.
I drafted this review a few days ago but didn’t post it. I’m glad I gave it some time since I’ve completely changed my position on this after watching many of the scenes again. This review may be a lot more subjective than I’d usually write. I really like this network. Peter Romero makes some excellent porn. It isn’t technically superior, but that adds to some of the amateur allure. He reminds me of the early days of gonzo porn when it was being shaped by guys like John Stagliano and Joey Silvera. This porn looks like it was fun to make, and that makes it fun to watch too. (Peter – If you read this, PLEASE make more Lap Dance Gone Bad scenes! That is an under-served niche.)
It is difficult to say precisely how many scenes are on this one site because there is a lot of cross-linking between the two main sites. The sites appear to date back to 2001 and some of the scenes date back to then. Needless to say, the quality of those scenes is low as was the standard then. Most of the older scenes are also broken into smaller files. Between the two sites there are easily over a hundred scenes. The site says they update frequently and they do update though I’m not certain as to the schedule. The newer scenes are available in three sizes, with the best being 3300kbps. Download speeds aren’t up to industry standards. Average speeds are 250KB/sec. I can report that the medium quality scenes (1000kbps, 640x480) look good.
There are also photos available for most of the scenes, but there is no option for zips.
The best feature of the site is the models that they have. The site is not skewed to professional porn models, though some are here. Of those, most of them seem to appear very early in their careers. For example, Taryn Thomas appears in 2004 (her career began that year) as Brynne. It’s fun to see her and others so fresh in the early days of her career. Many of the other models are unknown to me and appear to be true amateurs.
I’m not a big fan of the POV genre, but Peter makes it work and is able to capture the action well without making himself the star of the scene or shaking the camera so badly that the scene is unwatchable. For POV, this is well done.
Joining the network through TPB / PU gets you a reduced price. For that price you get some really decent porn. It has a true amateur feel to it – and I mean that in a good sense. If you like amateurs, porn stars before they were stars or POV, this site is worth a membership. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
