Fame Girls (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This site consists of only three models: Ella (age 18) Sandra (19 and Virginia (age 18). All are hot as a pistol, and each set of pictures I see of these beauties leaves me salivating to see more.
This is a non-nude, renewable, and non-renewing pay website. But don’t let the “non-nude” throw you, because although the genitals are skillfully concealed, these girls are so appetizing and photographed in such erotic attire and poses that your imagination does all the rest for you.
Note: Each girl also works at SEV-archive.com, which are separate sites of their earlier work and giving you eye-popping views closer to the peak of their youth.
To really better appreciate and get the most out of Fame-girls, one might do himself justice by first perusing the archives.
The content is 100%exclusive, have Zip’s, offers easy navigation, touts premier Hi-Res images.
151+ Galleries (avg.126 pics each) €25.00/$31.76 per Mo.(recurs at €22.00 Euro/mo. Small water marks but non-obtrusive. |
| Cons: |
There are no videos.
Updates are trice weekly, but only features one of the three girls at a time, therefore you have to wait on your favorite model.
No visual break-down or presentation of regional prices. All monies are in Euro, and don’t be surprised if you’re surprised.
You won’t see pussies (at least not whole ones). Enough, though, to feed the imagination and certainly what you see is mouth-watering.
Display of tits are bolder, but minimal.
Too many outdoor shootings, as well as more waste on the gals cutting up and making cute facial expressions.
Volume of pics, although substantial, are less than one would expect. I went through almost all of them in two settings.
Pricey. A greedy bunch; but the girls (especially Ella) are so damned addictive that caution is thrown to the wind. |
| Bottom Line: |
I came upon this site soon after it opened, which got me swept up by it's three tender, young models. These sexy Russian gals have a fresh, natural beauty and innocence that ..well, rocks! -- Happily disturbing some of my dormant, virility hormones and getting them off their collective asses.
Hark! Let me repeat: although the models are photographed in provocative settings, and shot in ingeniously clever ways to trick the eye, those juicy, budding little hair-sprinkled mounds (nestled between the legs) unfortunately hide behind fabric -- but to keep us coming back, we’re thrown just enough eye candy to keep our appetites wetted.
Pictures portray the girls frolicking and involved in playful antics, others are mood embodying, and, of course, the good stuff -- high octane poses that test the testes.
Worth repeating, probably because of the overall volume, this site being reviewed seemingly picks up later in the girls careers. The archives of their earlier work is individually seperate and noted on this reviewing site’s tour -- Which, again, I suggest you examine before hurriedly launching into this one
These girls are a good example of less being better. By that I mean creative tease stepping front and center showcasing arousal at it’s finest. Contrarily, The repetitious, pussy-close-up-images continuely being churned out now by this business have become overkill. Can one imagine the sight of a pussy as being jaded?
In conclusion -- For those who might fancy a diversion by retreating to a milder-erotic, theater of porn -- then a ticket to this site could be rewarding. Of course, at the same time, a charge conceivably exceeding $30 is something to think about.
I’ll be going back to Fame-Girls, because I want to follow those young ladies’ growth in this business. Especially, when and if the time comes that the strategically located “fabric” is pulled aside, or comes off.
I recommend only that one who might be interested, to visit Fame-Girls, take the tour, and decide on those merits if it's worth the trip. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
