| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
You see, Capn, that's exactly the appeal of the site for me. Just as in Village Ladies most of the models are far from glamorous but that's how I like it: unlikely models doing porn. I am not enamored of glamour porn, that's why I got so little out of the original 21Sextury. What stops me from subscribing to this site is that last time I tried they were going to charge me CA $ 77.00!!
|
07-23-11 10:34am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Capn (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - messmer :
I fully concur, but I do think they should be a little more selective.
Especially at that kind of ante. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-23-11 10:37am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Capn :
I agree about their need to be more selective, some of the models are a bit hard to look at! :-) Yet, rather they than some glossy Eastern European Model. To me it's all so artificial.
|
07-23-11 10:43am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Capn (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - messmer :
Yes, I am not into the artificial glam look either.
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-23-11 10:56am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - messmer :
Is there a lot of hardcore content?
|
07-23-11 01:49pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
malikstarks (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :
Yes, plenty of hardcore, I'd say about 50-50. I was a member many years ago (I'd say 2006 or 2007). Not sure how it's changed since.
|
07-23-11 03:39pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - malikstarks :
Thanks. I have to put that one on my future join list
|
07-23-11 05:28pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :
I see your question has been answered by someone who knows a lot more about the site than I, Pat. I've never been a member but came across a lot of their material when I still subscribed to the usenet. I liked their solos more than H/C at the time so didn't pay much attention how much there was of each. My guess wouldn't be accurate anyway because I only saw what people liked and posted.
|
07-23-11 06:18pm
Reply To Message
|
