So I think fair play to the webmaster for getting involved with the review replies, and ultimately the reviews do look truthful.
However I think one review would have been plenty at 60/65% I reckon, we could all put 97% for a site just because it was bang on what we were passionate about but it's useless to other people and not really (in my mind) the driving force behind a score.
Also all the cons are the same across all reviews and most of the pros simply state 'nice range of involved models', the 4 more recent reviewers could have just trusted and added comments to the first review, no need for that many seperate reviews.
It does look like a genuine site though, looks very transparent with contact details and cancellation links, lots of info in their FAQ section (probably more useful to read that than these reviews) and there are a couple of deviantart/youtube links on their site which sort of make up for a tour.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.