| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Just one Andrew Jackson a month with PU discount
-Few of the tattoos & fake tits now obligatory of mainstream US porn starlets.
-Young women banged by young men, not men old enough to pass as their dads.
-Site nav is simple, clean.
-A host of fresh faces.
-I don't recall any music. Hallelujah! |
| Cons: |
-Locations are stiflingly provincial, filmed at various somnolent hamlets in Eastern Europe. Adrift in a perpetual economic gloaming, the lads and lasses drinking bathtub liquor from their best, least chipped glasses. All but three or four women appear in jeans & sneakers.
-Many scenes are shot without much technical finesse. Dialing the camera's ISO to 1600 won't compensate for the lack of proper lighting. |
| Bottom Line: |
My sole reason for membership was to see sexual hanky-panky between young people of similar ages. Here, TeenSexMovs succeeds with roughly two-thirds of the action. Am I the only voyeur officially freaked out by mainstream porn's zillion scenes of 20 yr old girls pounded by 45 yr old men?
Does the PU membership know of similar sites? Write in as immortality awaits!
The apparent lack of anyone else in the room besides the performers and the cameraman lends an air of spontaneity.
Rawness of production values wears after 20 or 30 scenes. They don't own a tripod or more than one lens. Blankets are nailed to walls for backdrops. My guess: the closest the cameramen came to formal training was the day they drove past the front door to the Prague Institute of Cinematography. They didn't stop. |
