| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
Interesting review pat. You and I seem to have a lot of common porn interests but I don't think I'd enjoy a Brazzers membership. Because it is such a large network it's been on my mental list of possible sites to join, but never on my actual list. The problem for me is that most PU members (and one real life porn buddy) reported that there is a high percentage of women with implants and tattoos. That's pretty much a deal breaker for me, But I can understand why you'd score them so high. Most reviews mention that they get all the technical bits just about perfect, so if you like what they have to offer then this site is great. I think I once gave a Kink.com site a 99 and justified it by the fact that they really did everything well, but that obviously only matters if you like that material. And for me, a guy who like petite, natural models, while I can appreciate the effort of the folks at Brazzers, their material likely isn't for me.
|
11-28-11 02:23pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :
There's no denying that they hire many performers with implants but I stand by my view that it has less to do with choice and more to do with the pool of available performers without them being so small. it's even smaller when you add no tattoos to the list.
They have more than 1000 videos that contain performers without implants. The number could be much higher but I did a search for girls with natural breast and got that number. I know they must have more because they have a recent update with Alexis Texas and she's got natural breast but since they didn't tag the scene with natural breast than you wouldn't find it by searching that keyword.
I've resigned myself to the fact that if I want scenario porn than I have to be less critical on some other things.
|
11-28-11 06:17pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
hodayathink (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :
I have to disagree with you about the pool of available performers without implants being particularly small. I would say that because the other three major US based networks (Naughty America, Bangbros, and Reality Kings) are all drawing from the same talent pool and all feature more natural girls more often than Brazzers. The reason for Brazers overabundance of fake breasts, in my opinion, stems from the basic fact that they are a big tits focused site above anything else (and have been since they were first founded as Juggscash), and the majority of the big breasted women in porn weren't born that way.
|
11-28-11 06:44pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - hodayathink :
I'll give you Naughty America because they shoot porn in California but but I can't give you RK and bangbros because they shoot porn on the East Coast. I think Miami is their normal hunting ground. What can I say. LA is probably the capital of breast implants. I don't think Miami can say the same. Another reason why RK and Bangbros have a lot less girls with implants is that they hire European and South American performers and implants is more rare for those girls.
I agree that Brazzer caters more to the large breast market than some other sites but I don't think that's what they set out to do in the beginning. I just think that the popular models have implants and Brazzer hired them for their popularity. They probably didn't get too many complaints because the girl was popular and people were willing to overlook the impkants to see her do HC porn so they hired more girls with implants and so on.
|
11-28-11 06:58pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - pat362 :
Thanks for clarifying that pat. It makes sense that if you have a site with thousands of scenes then you'll have many with implants and tattoos.
I might continue to browse through the site and eventually take a membership.
|
11-29-11 03:37pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - rearadmiral :
I hope you get to see enough content to make a membership worth it because this is a very good site when it comes to quality of pics and videos.
|
11-30-11 07:26am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - pat362 :
Even if I don't see a lot of preview material your interests are a lot like mine so it would still be worth checking out.
|
12-01-11 03:15pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
aficionado11 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - pat362 :
That about sums it up. Very high quality site.
|
12-27-11 09:37am
Reply To Message
|
