| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Capn (0)
|
To be honest, you can't mark down a photo site for not having videos.
If it didn't have zips, yes.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-08-11 11:33pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
RLane (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Capn :
I didn't actually mark it down for no videos, I don't really care too much about videos, but it was for the image sizes compared to it's sister site.
|
12-08-11 11:55pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Capn (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - RLane :
No perhaps not, but you listed it in 'cons' without a rider on it.
Welcome to PU BTW !
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-09-11 05:25am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - RLane :
For the record ...
You *may* use whatever standard you wish to come up with the score you assign a site. Of course it does help if that standard more or less follows what other apply or you at least explain anything unique about how you arrived at your score.
While some other users may not feel it's fair to mark off for certain things, it's really your call.
Welcome to PornUsers
|
12-09-11 07:02am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
Rlane,
I actually thought this site would have rated higher the your other
review. This site seems to have very nice quality photo's at least in the tour section. It takes practice to get reviews down to how you like them done yourself. Like Staff said it your call how and why you rate something. I do like that gave a few details in the end about the sites.
If you are not able to find more to put in a review, look at others that may have posted many reviews.
And letting people know cost, how many photos or video etc.
Remember the reviews often get people to go take a look based sometimes on what you out in a review, so the more you give in details the more a person gets info about the site you are / were a member at .
Welcome to PU
|
12-09-11 10:59pm
Reply To Message
|
