Review Replies (4)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
BellaNetwork (Suspended)
|
10 or so videos does not get you banned Marcus. Why is it when someone breaks the terms of service and the server removes them for abuse, they can never man up and admit they were in the wrong? Before you join the terms of service are listed. You agree to these *before you join*. It clearly lists the limits (10gig per day) and if you perform or attempt a site rip, the server removes you. Of course you say otherwise, granted, but if you were a good member, you'd be on the inside still wouldn't you be? The server took action against you, sorry it felt it needed to.
My advice to you is to read terms of service before joining a site and do your best to follow those terms. We have many members that have been with us for three years straight now without issue. They don't try and download the site in one afternoon. :)
|
12-31-11 10:55am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
ipg386 (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - BellaNetwork :
Oh, I see, so we are supposed to monitor the exact amount of porn we are downloading to be sure we don't go over the limits you put in the fine print of the user agreement? Are you joking? Do you really think anyone reads your agreements? This is porn not a mortgage application. And by the way, how does a customer, who is paying you for your service deserve to be called a rip off?
|
12-31-11 06:49pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
tangub (0)
|
It's quite amazing that a paying customer should be called a thief, I would suggest it's the website who are thieves if they took your 28 bucks then booted you off the site. The terms of service seem a bit ambiguous to me especially the section under "downloading" where they talk about average daily quotos across the membership database. How the hell is anyone supposed to know what other members are downloading and what an average daily quota is. Also the daily download lmit does not make it clear if its per site or for the network. It does look like a nice network of sites that might interest me but being a photo freak myself the lack of zip files means i'm unlikely to ever join.
|
01-01-12 03:06am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Marcus (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - BellaNetwork :
See, this is the attitude I was going on about. I took the time to explain what happened to the webmaster, but it just kept getting dismissed over and over again and treated like a thief.
I'm pretty sure the server banned me because my IP number changed. That's fine, I understand that. My ADSL connection at the time was awful and kept dropping so presumably I kept getting another IP number (it has now been fixed, I got a nice new shiney router for Christmas)
It certainly wouldn't have been me ripping content. I never ever rip content, not even for my personal use. I'm choosy about what I download.
I have just looked in my Bryci folder and there is 1.66gb (11 videos).
I absolutely did not share my password. Absolutely not. I could account for every video I downloaded from the site. I listed them all in an email to admin.
I asked what evidence there was to ban me and this was never answered, I just kept getting preachy soundbites about "if I read the T&Cs..." like above.
I kept asking which T&C I broke, and was just fobbed off and told I shared the password. Which I didn't.
It made me so angry as I was honestly a genuine member. I think the website is outstanding with lots of incredible content in, in that respect I would recommend it to anyone, and it was definitely the kind of website I could see myself becoming a long term member of.
I know you probably think I'm a liar or thief or whatever. There's enough out there. But I am absolutely none of these things, and definitely didn't break any of the terms and conditions, definitely not through downloading 10 gig a day! I don't think I've ever downloaded that much!
Being accused of (at best...) breaking the terms and conditions when you know you haven't, and haven't been given any evidence or reason is such a horrible feeling.
|
01-01-12 08:03am
Reply To Message
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|