Comment Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Capn (0)
|
Functionality is superior at WAH & the Webmanager is very responsive.
ATK is a much bigger outfit & therefore more ponderous in getting improvements implemented.
ATKNH have shedloads more content, WAH has only been going a couple of years.
Models & content is a very personal thing.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-30-12 12:32pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
I'll second Basil's attentiveness as a factor. As for WAH not running to "XXX", I think you should consider that not all porn is hardcore and that there are fans of the softer side of things. If the site's not your thing, it's just not your thing.
|
01-30-12 12:44pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
Since reviews cannot be but subjective, here are my reasons for rating WAH higher than ATK:
Less emphasis on extreme hairiness (legs, arms, anus, belly etc.), something I dislike heartily, especially hairy legs.
ATK has become increasingly more extreme over the years.
No hardcore! Many of us prefer softcore solo models.
Material is better in quality because they only started a couple of years ago so most is in HD or, the few very earliest updates, in near HD quality.
Number of updates approaching those of ATK but of better quality, especially the pictures. Custom zip available.
Site makes it easy to browse.
Friendly and very responsive webmaster!
You on the other hand come at the judgment of the sites from a different angle. Every update containing hardcore always got the lowest marks from me in ATK while you bemoan the fact that WAH does not give you any hardcore. Nothing wrong with your preferences except when it comes to comparing the two sites. Just like apples and oranges, in my opinion.
In any case, welcome to Porn Users, xexbot, I don`t think I`ve seen your name before.
|
01-30-12 12:52pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
