| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
otoh (0)
|
Seems like you're back on the mature sites, messmer :) Thanks for the review - I've not joined any Ferro sites, although I've been tempted since they have a few nylon-themed ones, I think. But now we are used to some very good sites, it seems a bit much to charge a full $30 for such a basic setup...
|
02-01-12 12:28am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Denner (0)
|
Thanks for another review of a mature site, messmer....
Guess like you, I still keep hunting for those overwhelming, great, fabulous sites with fine mature (and mature lingerie) content....It ain't easy - not easy to find the ones with productions where you just say: Wow!!!
Joined the Anilos lately, but...??? Too few, really fines ones here...
Like you, I'm still on the hunt...
Maybe our only solution is going back to those vintage deals, but, boy - why can't someone produce those top-mature-lingerie-ect. sites???
A bit sad.
|
02-01-12 06:56am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
BTW: On the subject my favorite is Janet Mason...and she's still on..
|
02-01-12 07:14am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Denner :
Thanks, fellow searcher and sufferer. I agree with you about Anilos.
It could be for different reasons or maybe not, Denner.
I've been tempted to re-subscribe to the site for months but a) I find most of their models too young looking for my taste, and b) they forget to bring lingerie to most of their shoots which makes most updates too dull for me. I simply do not appreciate nudity right from page one. It has to be more gradual for me.
I find this the case with all of the photo sites I've subscribed to lately. People must be collecting models, rather than models plus what they wear. Therefore one set appears the same as those that came before and those who will follow. Same basic three, four pieces of clothing, same poses, same everything ... yawn.
|
02-01-12 02:08pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - otoh :
I would personally steer clear of them, otoh. The set-up is too primitive and the watermarks rob me of any joy in their videos. Still haven't received a reply re. "why couldn't I download the zipped picture sets," so that too counts against Ferro.
Talking about nylon-themed sites. Modern times mess me up here because my heart goes pitter patter when I see "nylons" and then find mainly pantyhose (tights). The definition of nylons must have changed dramatically over the years. Talking about nylon in general I much prefer it to cotton which absolutely turns me off to this day. I got used to shaved but never to cotton, or to thongs for that matter! :-)
|
02-01-12 02:15pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Denner :
I must have a look for Janet Mason, Denner. Tell the truth, after that initial look at the three Ferro sites I now have access to, I stopped going because I cannot stand their watermarks and their primitive navigation.
|
02-01-12 02:18pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - messmer :
About Janet Mason:
Brother in Arms, messmer...lol - seriously: She has done a LOT of fine porn and including lingerie - but/and I'd be bankrupt if I - to day - should go after all her fine material at alas too many sites: Manojob, Brazzers, Naughty America, HDPorn.com, Danni, even Karups and Anilos...and her own site....ect.
But it's - as usual - a matter of a lot of browsing.
Bottom line: She's a very special mature doll/girl/woman..
|
02-02-12 06:35am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Denner :
Sorry, Denner, I misunderstood your reference to Janet Mason, I thought you were talking about the Ferro sites and looked high and low for her name. I think I'll check Anilos, that would most likely be the quickest way of putting a face to the name. I am sure I must have seen her before if she appeared in all those sites.
Sorry, old pal, old friend. I just came back from a tour of Anilos and now know why I've never heard of Janet: she has enhanced breasts and therefore is a model I would always ignore because of that factor. The rest of her is fine!! :-)
|
02-02-12 10:45am
Reply To Message
|
