| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
If this is the network I think it is, I say it's well worth joining at least once. Yeah, the camera can be shaky, lighting bad and sound is just a radio blasting next to camera but the content is quite fresh and unique. The whole scenes take huge amounts of space though.
|
03-07-12 09:30pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
BadMrFrosty (0)
|
Glad to help :)
|
03-08-12 08:13am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - RustyJ :
Agreed Rusty, this place has some different content which is definitely worth a membership. It's such a great shame they can't photograph professional models in a professional way, and from comments elsehwere, these ARE profesional models. At least most of them are not the same models we see in hundreds of videos, but are relatively fresh faces (and bodies).
Thanks again Frosty, without your comment I'd have missed this one, but I was aware of Chicki Porn. I would have signed on for $15 more, with 5 fewer sites. The TBP/PU WTF link gives a massive 42 per cent off Chicki Porn prices.
|
03-08-12 08:29am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
I have edited my original comment. You get three extra sites not four like I originally said. In my last reply I then went and typed five extra sites. The mix up came because Chicki Porn is Dolls Porn on WTF. Thankfully Frosty is more reliable than I am.
As an addition I would have hoped the camerawork would improve over the years, but the latest "Wild New Year College Orgy," added at the end of last year, on College Fuck Parties, has not only 9(!) parts, it has some of the worst lighting, and worst camerawork I have ever seen.
|
03-08-12 08:48am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Tree Rodent :
Yes, they are mostly professional although there are some I've never seen before or since then again. Also there are many who were on these sites before they were everywhere.
|
03-08-12 09:00am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
BadMrFrosty (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Tree Rodent :
To be fair, I think the amateurish lighting and camera work is kind of the point. Its supposed to feel like you are watching a actual party and not a professional porn shoot. The same with the home video site and the public sex site, they are supposed to feel "real". The other sites, especially the massage one, have great lighting and camera work IMHO.
|
03-08-12 09:55am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - BadMrFrosty :
Yes I agree there Frosty, the massage porn one is not so bad, although that maybe because there is one setting and one couple.
Possibly I am just being too negative (as usual), but we all know these are professional models. Even when photographing amateur models, I prefer to see directors and cameramen who are professionals, shooting in a professional way. But I do take your point. It does make it look more amateurish, which may appeal to some.
|
03-08-12 10:01am
Reply To Message
|
