| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
jd1961 (0)
|
If you look on the 2nd or 3rd page there is a girl named "Mina" that is a set from W4B.
|
08-15-07 07:00pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :
Yes, indeed.
I've been a W4B member a few times and have scoured the entire site. Everything I see in the preview/visitor's pages of the site looks just like what I've seen at W4B.
|
08-16-07 03:20am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
This site seems to deserve the mark "Clone".
When you watch the videos at preview they're absolutly the same as in W4B.
|
09-03-07 09:02am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Denner :
Agreed. A while back, the webmaster at W4B responded to some of my criticisms of that site and said that it was all exclusive with a small number of exceptions. To be fair, I don't believe that "Glossy Angels" was in existence at that time.
Still, what is going on? Who gave the go-ahead on Glossy Angels? It sure looks like a clone to me, kind of a "Mini-Me" to W4B, which I think is the better of the two since there are more image size options.
|
09-03-07 02:31pm
Reply To Message
|
