| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
otoh (0)
|
Met Art seems to be a very divisive site! You can't argue with the amount of material or the beauty of the models but I have to agree with you. It's not so much the level of explicitness; just that in most cases they just don't have much in the way of seductiveness or tease.
FTV is on my list; I could also recommend Breath Takers or Petites Parisiennes if you want to stick to fairly soft material but with a bit more personality; or if you want a bit more but still glam and well-produced, perhaps Digital Desire?
|
04-16-12 09:26am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Ergo Proxy (0)
|
Your comment has some flaws:
1. East european models are the most beautiful women there are and they don't look the same, maybe look closer.
2. The human body has only a limited number of poses. What do you expect? If you apply this criterion the galleries would turn into boring after the 3rd set or so.
3. Blank stares??? Maybe you joined the wrong site.
4. MetArt has the most diversified shooting locations one can think of.
I admit that the newer sets are all glamour and polished, not like the old sets from 2002-200x but they are still worthwile. It sounds like a rant here but I think you are just pissed that you joined and did not get what you wanted but from their previews it should have been pretty clear to you what to expect. I am just puzzled from your reaction.
|
04-16-12 03:11pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
gyang79 (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Ergo Proxy :
East European models are the most beautiful, in your own opinion. If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you. Half the women on that site do not look happy to be there. It doesnt have to be hardcore for me to like it just a bit more lively. The women of FTV appear more lively, healthy, and def holds my interest over MET-ART. I thought id give them a try based on the great reviews but im utterly disappointed.
|
04-18-12 03:47am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Ergo Proxy (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - gyang79 :
I get it that everyone has his own views of beauty, but by all fair means finding the women of Metart that repugnant? And where comes the following from?
"If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you"
In what possible way on holy mother's earth are the models there "nearly starved to death"? I was making an "effort" here and dug out my MetArt folder and skimmed through a bunch of galleries and couldn't find a single model which can be suspected of bulimia. Anyway I don't want to argue that much anymore.
But I really want to know, did you subscribe to FTV and are you satisfied there? Just curious.
|
04-18-12 07:53am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
gyang79 (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Ergo Proxy :
Yes I've subscribed to FTV girls before. Great site and gorgeous women. I highly recommend it!
|
04-18-12 10:19am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
tangub (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - gyang79 :
Have to agree they have many gorgeous models at FTV but i've never been convinced its that great a site for those of us who prefer photo content compared to a site like Met Art.
|
04-19-12 12:29am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
gyang79 (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Ergo Proxy :
Well I must say you have a valid argument. I have discovered the advanced search feature, cant believe I havent found it before. Def some gorgeous models on here. Navigation for this site is a bit tricky.
|
04-20-12 09:28pm
Reply To Message
|
