| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
fritzryan (0)
Webmaster
|
Yes - it's my bad luck that you hit the site the only time the cms has had a glitch since I started.
- I've held back from promoting the site as a 'hardcore' because I didn't want to misrepresent the content to members.
- New releases are increasing in hardcore.
- 'thebestporn' chose to list all the sites. I only intended them to offer webmasters a 'long' and 'short' sitefront to suit their traffic. Not every affiliate wants to promote a site that has big pages to load like fritzryan has.
- thats why all the members of all the sites get the full content. I didn't want to 'short-change' anyone.
- I'm thinking now of eiether dropping 3 of the sites or splitting the content.
- zip files are a good idea too. It will be a little while before I have the time to zip up the sets and ftp them to the server in their correct folders. I just lost a whole day dealing with the cms issue and some video player bugs with the DivX clips. Still it's on the 'to do' list as a good idea.
- I've tried to be really honest with surfers and not overstate the site or the content.
- It's interesting that you like the unique content (lesia etc). It takes me a huge effort to go and find these girls and then convince them to do hardcore. There are a lot of girls even in Russia who just do the revolving door of content producers.
- But I also get lots of supportive members who want me to move ahead and keep shooting and it gives me a buzz to get their feedback and help.
- Many good ideas and tips have come from early members. It feels like 'family' sometimes!
- But the 'caning' you gave the site in your review has had a result though.
- Fritz Ryan
|
08-31-07 06:40am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
igolli (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - fritzryan :
Thanks for the reply Fritz. I hope you donīt get me wrong the fact that I mentioned the clone sites doesnīt have any relevancy for the rating. I did it just to complete the information about the site. And of course I want that you go ahead and keep shooting. My review is not intended to frustrate you. I am trying to publish objective reviews but I cannot eliminate my point of viewing sites as a hardcore fan. The basic facts which are influencing my rating are the type of content, the quality of the sets and the pricing. The rating for the type of content is determined by the level of the action and the beauty of girls. I am very attracted if I am going to see a new beauty doing hardcore like Lesia or softmodels which are appearing in a hardcore video. Like I said in my review: Your site has the potential to become 1 of the most unique sites in the net. Yor cumshots are great and thats what should appear in the future sets. Great cumshots and newfaces...what a hot combination who can resist to join?
New faces in softcore action I can find a lot in the net.
Finally I am looking forward for the future updates.
|
09-01-07 07:44am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
fritzryan (0)
Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #2 - igolli :
Yes - thanks for your feedback.
- I appreciate that you are genuine - so am I.
Most of my 'backend' as you see it now represents where I've come from and the new releases represent where I'm heading.
- I'm doing more hardcore but in all countries girls resist hardcore and the ones that do generally turn 'pro' overnight and shoot for every studio they can find.
- a prime example is SashaBlonde or Alisa - I shot both of these girls early, before they were even on Met-Art even but niether would do hardcore.
So while I was accumulating enough content to launch a site these girls and a dozen of the others became famous but it still leaves me at the 'back of the pack' so to speak.
I found the girls early on enough but I didn't have the 'muscle' to get lots of them and get my site up quicker.
- You'll like some of the new girls coming up like Krista and Jana - and there's Larisa and a new shoot of Lesia too.
- Also I can assure you that any girl shooting at all has already signed a release and produced ID for the shooter, even in Russia.
Girls who 'relent' are generally following a script and have developed a talent for it.
As soon as you deal with Russian amateurs you can see that the 'scripting' is the first thing to go out the window because of language difficuties.
- Support for the site from tbp has stopped altogether although it might start up if they publish an in-house review, but on the strength of your review sales have ceased, so people do read them!
But I will weather it all and I believe that i'll achieve my goal of producing a top class site of genuine and lovely girls doing solo/hardcore.
- Oh - also i've got to add that the only reason some of the unique girls (like Lesia) do shoot hardcore is that they've learned to trust me from doing the solo shoots. The dynamics of finding girls outside the 'studios' is fascinating and frustrating sometimes!
- Anyhow I hope you continue to enjoy the site
|
09-01-07 06:10pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
igolli (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - fritzryan :
I donīt think that my review is to strength. I am thinking and considering a lot of things before I am writing a review. The first point is that I am writing at "pornusers.com" and not for a general sexsite blog or whatsoever. So my focus is strictly on porn considering the domain name. A website with softcontent will not get a rating of more than 70 points from me. POV shoots usually are not getting the rating-points because of some special extraordinary action. To reach the maximum points in this field "artificial" shooted scenes from the big companies are predestinated. A POV porn receives points for the private atmosphere which gives us consumers the feeling we could also get those girls in our bed if we just effort the time etc. The other point magnet are the beauty of the girls which are suddenly ready for the "dirty stuff". If I see a famous softmodel in hc-action I am fully satisfied and happy. These are the eye catchers I would like to see more and more. Of course I know about the difficulties to get those girls from chats with other producers. Till now you have more softstuff than those unique hardcore sets. Thats why there is still a long way to reach the higher point-ratings from hardcorefans.
|
09-02-07 09:57am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
fritzryan (0)
Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #4 - igolli :
You seriously would rate Abbey Winters, FTV, Hegre, Femjoy and Met-Art all without any hardcore at all at less than 70 points?
- Fritz.
|
09-02-07 03:50pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
igolli (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - fritzryan :
No the 70 points rating is fit for "normal" sites wich offering soft content. Sites like met-art are very special. The focus is on nude art photographie with very different styles of the photos in exclusiv locations. To rate such a site the reviewer will have to consider other facts......nothing is without exceptions. I join met-art from time to time.
|
09-03-07 02:12am
Reply To Message
|
