| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
Are you telling me that you only joined Brazzer because you thought that they would have hundreds upon hundreds of 18 or 19 years old models and that any girl above 19 is unacceptable? Unless I'm mistaken then that is what you are saying in your review. Did you check out their preview section prior to joining? I did and 11 of the 12 most updates with the teen tag doesn't even qualify since the girls are all over 19 and some of them by more than a couple of years.
If you had to join a site that mostly hires teens then why pick a site that clearly hires performers of different age groups but tends to always hire women older than 19?
I don't want to ruin your day but if you are looking for a site that only hires teens then you should quit now because it doesn't exist. You do get a decent percentage of teens girls who make the jump to porn each year but the number is never high enough that a site could hire them all and hope to survive with just them and even if they could then most of these girls don't do a lot of hardcore porn at first so that you would be stuck with some midcore to low key hardcore stuff anyway.
I have no problem with anyone awarding the score they believe a site earned but I need something more than vague opinions as to why the site got that score.
|
10-14-12 05:50pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
I get your drift, pawn. Peers you really put the "high-an-mighty" bunch in the brazzer family in their place: -- (the outhouse).
I especially liked the lumps you gave the faux teen sporting pigtails.
Welcome to our cozy little place in the sun, pawn. Make yourself comfortable and Don't be a stranger.
|
10-14-12 06:29pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
A first I was taken back at the 50, but you clearly explained your displeasure and why. Can't take issue with a person saying their beef.
I was smirking as well as you clearly had taken a notice of what they say and what they produced. I for one only a few times back in the day.
I however found the POV shots to be too much and they fumbled the camera too much just my opinion of course nice to the point opinion welcome to PU.
|
10-15-12 08:23am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
Likewise welcome to PU.
I suppose it's all a matter of taste, but I am stunned by the number of high 90's scores I see given to Brazzers, Reality Kings, and Bangbros, so this well below the norm sort of score is a welcome balance.
Personally I don't agree with 50, or the reason given, as they don't claim to be a teen site (Try 21 Sextury or Teen Mega World), but given some of the stuff that has been written by PU members about the negatives of these companies over the years, I don't mind seeing them getting a 50.
Virtually every company claims to be the "best" or "world's best." Each and every one of them, except for one, is lying. That's porn.
I hope you stick around and let us know what you think of the teen sites.
|
10-15-12 04:41pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
When I saw the score I thought "Another who feels he's been scammed" but no. This was just quite extreme opinion.
|
10-16-12 11:01am
Reply To Message
|
