Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

My Sister's Hot Friend (0)

Newbie 88* marcdc1 (0) 11-27-12  07:45pm                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Often updates: 4-5 times a month. As a member of the Naughty America network, there is an update every day (usually 2-3) - With about 8 years of backlog: there are almost 500 scenes. Added to the almost 5,100 shoots on the network means you'll never run out of content here! - The best organization. Whichever you're favorite way to search you can use it here: chronology, star, search bar, key words, "fantasy finder" they make it easy to find something you'll like. - looks like about 250 girls have shot for this site alone and lord knows how many across the network. They shoot a variety of upcoming talent and vets. - HD quality for the new stuff (1080p, 720p, 480p), mid 2007 starts the "DVD quality" 720X540 3mbps. Before that it's mostly 640X480 512 kbps. They did a good job of keeping up with technology and shooting with good lighting/sound - good execution. This "fantasy" is broad enough that you get a good enough mix of scenarios. Cons: - Focus on mainstream means there's a lot of sameness: - most girls have boob jobs - almost every shoot ends in facial - if you're looking for ethnic diversity there isn't much here (although they did put a focus on Latinas for some of there sites, so that is an exception) - There's not much to complain about here other than the sameness - I hate to say this about porn... but it can get boring. They need to spark some imagination. More recent scenes are better, but still true as a general statement. Bottom Line: My Sister's Hot Friend is a sold site with a huge network behind it. They often run deal so join their news letter to save some money. With this much content, and great production value. You really can't go wrong. If you have a favorite porn star, odds are she's shot for naughty america (and quite possibly MSHF). The preview section does a good job of showing you what you'll get (without giving away the farm). If the preview passes you're gut check, I recommend joining. You get you're money's worth. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 hodayathink (0) This isn't necessarily in regards to you, but something that bugs me about quite a few people on this site: You say that "most of the girls have boob jobs". That's not true. It might be true for Naughty America as a whole (I'd argue that for the whole network it's fairly close to 50/50, but I can see how people would construe that as "most" since it's close to the majority). But for this site in particular, the balance shifts much more towards natural than it does fake. Of the last 20 updates, only 4 featured fake breasts. Of the last 100, only 22. That's not most at all. 11-28-12  08:32pm Reply To Message 2 marcdc1 (0) REPLY TO #1 - hodayathink : Thanks for replying hodyathink. You know I have nothing but the utmost respect for you. And I will absolute bow to your superior knowledge of all thinks Naughty American. I think you are a bigger fan of the site and the network than I am. And I know from our previous posts you have spent more time as a member. To my defense, as you mentioned, of the 5,091 scenes 1,800 have natural. If my math is right (which many of you know it seldom is)that's 35% with natural. I think I was guilty of not seeing the forrest through the trees. I also want to go on record as not having anything agains fake boobs. (I only ask that they look good). I often include this information because I know it is a big deal to some. Thanks again for making my review more clear. You are absolute correct in everything you said. 11-29-12  05:02pm Reply To Message 3 hodayathink (0) REPLY TO #2 - marcdc1 : I've been a member for about 4 years now (it's my only standing membership to any site), so I've come to know a lot about it. I'm probably a bigger fan of them than anyone that posts here. And I know they have their flaws (and quite a few of them), but I tend to want to correct people when they post things that are flat out not correct. And if you look, while 1800 are tagged as natural, only 1781 are tagged as fake, so there's obviously a bunch of scenes that aren't tagged as either one. And going by the tags, like I said, it's about 50/50. 11-29-12  05:15pm Reply To Message 4 marcdc1 (0) REPLY TO #3 - hodayathink : There you have it. 50/50. Thank you for the clarification. And for all the help you provided. 11-29-12  05:18pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.06 seconds.