| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
Thanks for the entertaining review Gray one. You happened to pick out a couple of big irritants as far as I'm concerned. First of all the ever present genitalia closeups. Then there's the constant moving about. You get to the point where they finally show the whole girl in all her glory, then they have to change her position and it's back to the closeups.
The cameraman goes to sleep on the closeups, but the minute they finally focus on the whole body they have to move. You just cannot get to experience the glory of the whole body. It's like they do it deliberately just to piss off porn viewers. "Ner ner ner, you paid for this, but you're not going to see anything stimulating, oh no, we can do this all the time to the end of the video you know." And they do.
|
01-21-13 06:11pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
Hey, graymane, I always enjoy your reviews. How did you like all the hairy legs?
Us old timers tend to wax sentimental over the good old days before the models shaved but we think mostly of the pubic bush, while this site has evolved into a true fetishists dream.
As you stated "hair, hair everywhere" - hair on the nipples, hair in the pits, hair on the legs, hair in the cracks. However, one thing in their favor I do believe that their statistics might very well be right on.
This site has been around for a long, long time, therefore between 8 - 10 picture updates a day, with most sets containing at least a hundred pictures, it is not beyond belief that they have as many sets and models as they say they have.
I recently quit with two months to go, not because they lied to me, but because I found most updates either too hairy for my taste (the legs) or too bland or for the "vaginal over exposure" as you put it so nicely. But you know me, looking at a set without the girl at least wearing some sort of erotic lingerie, is the epitome of boredom.
|
01-21-13 07:01pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Tree Rodent :
Thanks, Squirrel. Appreciate the time out you took to pass on this thoughtful message. Happy I could be of some help.
I notice just recently your forum activity had dropped off some.
We miss your stuff when you ain't around, champ. I hope all is well, and, as always, wishing you the best.
|
01-22-13 08:24am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - graymane :
Thanks Graymane, it's reciprocated. Your contributions are always entertaining, as well as informative.
I guess like most of us, I look in but don't contribute as much nowadays, unless there's something I just have to get off my chest. There's not enough time at the moment to post here, or view porn, but at least I don't get jaded as some do.
Been a porn fan since I was 8, so I suppose I'm never going off it, but I could do with some more customer oriented networks. There's only a limited influence PU can have, and currently the mainstream market is very homogeneous, for a number of reasons. All we can do is register our opinion.
Happily today is a day and night off, so I can spend some time putting together a review.
|
01-22-13 08:50am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - messmer :
Thanks, Mess .....As you well know, your thoughts are very much appreciated. maybe your kind words will inspire me to step up my activity with reviews. Might interest you to know, despite the slings-an-arrows you rained down on this site in your past, excellent review, It was instrumental in my decision to go with them.
How did I like the leg-hair, you asked?........ Well, they were delicious, of course. Gotta let your imagination run wild, like pulling out the leg hairs with my teeth...... lotta proteins there, big guy!
|
01-22-13 08:50am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
otoh (0)
|
Great review, GM, thanks for all the useful info. I far prefer unshaven models, so keep an eye on reviews for the hairy sites - but I guess the search continues for one which isn't a) leaning toward scary hairy; and b) is actually erotic!
|
01-22-13 08:50am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #6 - otoh :
Many thanks, Otoh. Appreciate you taking the time to pass on your valued thoughts. But hey! you're one of PU's major torchbearers of late.
You're all over the place around here. .... an' we love-it!
|
01-22-13 09:09am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - graymane :
Ooooh, gross! That picture is going to stay with me all day now. But your answer also gave me a bit of insight as to why the site is doing well despite the leg hair. I was honestly convinced that it was despised by the vast majority of subscribers. As I said only yesterday, learn something new every day. :-) Enjoy the hair, gm!!
|
01-22-13 09:56am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
marcdc1 (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - graymane :
GM,
Thank you again for an excellent review. I particularly like the Shakespeare reference in the reply section :)
The Bard would be proud, know if you could only have it all in iambic pentameter and include a pun :)
Hope too see more reviews from you again soon-
|
01-22-13 06:47pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #9 - marcdc1 :
Ditto, my good friend. Always better the second time around.
Wish I could express the enormity of appreciation I'd prefer to get over to you and the others who respond so positively to my stuff.
When Webster finally releases a few more good adjectives, you'll be the first to know.
|
01-22-13 07:54pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #8 - messmer :
Of course, you do know I was only kidding about dining solely on leg hair........ gross indeed.
let me clarify by saying, after the strands are extracted, you put them on salads .... you know, where a dressing of some sort would set off the flavor.
|
01-22-13 08:06pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Capn (0)
|
Always interesting to see your take, G. :0)
I have to agree with a lot of your points, but for me it is the only subscription I have at the moment.
That says volumes for the lack of choice in our favoured genres.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-23-13 09:15am
Reply To Message
|
13
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #11 - graymane :
You are a sick, sick man, graymane!!! :-)
|
01-23-13 11:07am
Reply To Message
|
14
|
marcdc1 (0)
|
REPLY TO #10 - graymane :
lol. Very good sir.
|
01-23-13 01:40pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #9 - marcdc1 :
With due consideration directed to, and distance of respect I've garnered for, in the sheer joy of following your extraordinary writing skills, I have to say compliments coming from one so learned as you simply amplifies that joy that much more.
PS....
I have to say, though, the terms associated with Shakespeare you used having to do with the words "iambic pentameter" has me stumped.
Even Google can't come up with a comprehensively sensible meaning.
Again .... your reply to this review is appreciated.
|
01-25-13 07:12am
Reply To Message
|
16
|
marcdc1 (0)
|
REPLY TO #15 - graymane :
Ah sir, the fault most likely results from my ever poor spelling. I've included a useful link for what I was trying to reference. It's the line structure that Shakespeare used in most of his writing. (if I'm not mistaken it's also called blank verse).
http://shakespeare.about.com/od/shakespe...e/a/i_pentameter.htm
Thank you as always for the discussion-
|
01-25-13 04:43pm
Reply To Message
|
