Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
This is another site where I wish the webmaster would chime in to defend their content. But I guess we all know better - 300 x 200 pictures? Last I checked, this isn't 1985.
Isn't it funny how the crappiest sites are the hardest to review?
|
04-20-13 07:39am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
marcdc1 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :
It kills me 'cause I try to focus on the positive, and as I've mentioned in other posts, I think I'm too easy as a reviewer.
But this site is awfully dated. Which is a shame cause I think the passion across the network is there and would make great porn, if only they would invest in it.
Here's hoping to seeing a lightyear's worth of improvement :)
|
04-20-13 09:59am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
You got my attention...... No Candy for this guy.
|
04-21-13 01:24am
Reply To Message
|