Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Candy Christopher (0)

Newbie 55* marcdc1 (0) 04-17-13  02:13pm                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Candy is a hot MILF who loves sex - that really comes across. She has an easy smile and laugh and is very charming. She is truly photogenic - a lot of interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some). There are some shoots with her husband so it's not exclusively ir. - Mix of content: fisting squirting, masterbation, cream pie, etc. it's anything but boring - Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year. Cons: - Much of the content is shared with Candy's other site cuckoldmyhusband.com. Since there isn't much content to begin with that's a serious problem. In addition both sites are part of the same network which in it's advertising counts them separately. Granted there are differences but these sites really should just be merged. - just over 70 videos. Most are under 15 minutes - pictures are not available as .zip - picture quality is 300X200. - organization is clean but basic. There's no search or tagging functions. However with such slim pickings there isn't much of a need :( - 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen. Bottom Line: This is a bear bones site, which is a shame cause there's certainly potential here. I have a hard time excusing only having such limited content when you've been in business so long. The poor quality and the lack of content are unforgivable. When I joined there was a deal, 1 year for 30$. So my expectations were low. I certainly was not surprised with what I got. Even at such a low price I wouldn't recommend. The convoluted organization makes doing these reviews a chore - but I figure if anyone searches for these sites they'll at least benefit from my experience Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (3) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 RagingBuddhist (Disabled) This is another site where I wish the webmaster would chime in to defend their content. But I guess we all know better - 300 x 200 pictures? Last I checked, this isn't 1985. Isn't it funny how the crappiest sites are the hardest to review? 04-20-13  07:39am Reply To Message 2 marcdc1 (0) REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist : It kills me 'cause I try to focus on the positive, and as I've mentioned in other posts, I think I'm too easy as a reviewer. But this site is awfully dated. Which is a shame cause I think the passion across the network is there and would make great porn, if only they would invest in it. Here's hoping to seeing a lightyear's worth of improvement :) 04-20-13  09:59am Reply To Message 3 graymane (Suspended) You got my attention...... No Candy for this guy. 04-21-13  01:24am Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.