Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn (0)

MargulisAZ (0) 07-17-13  08:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Hot girls - horrible scenes

I don't think I've ever seen a site that has so many hot girls but yet fails so miserably at making hot scenes. The camera work is terrible, there are countless times that for whatever inexplicable reason they point it so that you can't really see any of the good action you want to see. At least half of the scene you won't see the girl's pussy or real action shot whatsoever - as I said terrible positioning of the camera and models. Also the scenes are so incredibly monotonous and run of the mill. They really need to spice things up a bit and change their camerawork and lighting too.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (6)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

pat362 (0) Truer words were never said. It's mind blogging to think that this guy is able to hire such amazingly cute girls willing to do hardcore porn and he has been doing this for a few years and he still can't shoot the porn in any way that can be considered decent.

I tried the site twice and I think I was more pissed the second time than the first because the guy actually managed to do a worse job in the more recent shoots than he did in past ones. I know that all the shots avoid showing the male performers face(not sure why) so that really limits the possible angles but it still doesn't explain the piss poor camera work done by the camera operator.

07-18-13  06:41pm

Reply To Message

2

MargulisAZ (Suspended) REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :

I noticed the exact same thing, that the newer scenes were even worse than the older ones.
07-22-13  02:12am

Reply To Message

3

djrc2012 (0) AS LONG AS IT ISN'T POV THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS BAD CAMERA WORK! SITE'S CAMERA WORK IS DECENT GIVIN THE CIRCUMSTANCES.ALSO NO ONE WANTS TO SEE 20 MINUTE PUSSY ACTION CLOSE UP SHOTS.IF YOU WANT THAT HEAD TO BANGBROS OR ELEGANT ANGEL.AS LONG AS THE GIRLS STAY SMOKING MONOTONY DOESNT MATTER.QUALITY OF THE GIRLS IS WHAT MAKES THIS OUTSTANDING SITE STAND OUT.IF YOU WANT DIFFERENT SCENERY OR A PLOT GO TO SWEETSINNER.COM
08-11-13  10:44am

Reply To Message

4

MargulisAZ (Suspended) REPLY TO #3 - djrc2012 :

quotes like "as long as it isn't pov there's no such thing as bad camera work" and "monotony doesn't matter" have got to be some of the most ridiculous comments I've seen on here in a while. And your post as a whole reeks of someone associated with the site trying to defend it.
10-21-13  10:16am

Reply To Message

5

MargulisAZ (Suspended) REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :

still nothing has changed lol - what a joke this site
04-03-16  08:47pm

Reply To Message

6

pat362 (0) REPLY TO #5 - MargulisAZ :

That's too bad because all they have to do is look at mompov to see how you can do first porn scene with a one model one performer and one camera and come out with a decent scene.
04-04-16  03:20pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.