2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :
I see your point. Jack's streaming vids at least will display "full screen" and are replayable. Vivid's shit vids are in that tiny, tiny little window and offer no control to the user and are so long that any attempt at fowarding or replaying leads to total meltdown.
Vivid charges $10 for this pleasure; Jack's is $30 a month. I'd say Jack's is better than .. let me rephrase that: not as bad as Vivid, but still bad enough to leave the subscriber with that "got fucked over again" feeling.
|
09-29-07 02:52am
Reply To Message
|