Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Jack\'s Playground

Jack's Playground (0)

Drooler (0) 09-27-07  04:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Wants to Sell Those DVDs

I'd almost forgotten about Jack's Playground, so here's some info. Mind you, I joined it once, in Jan. 2006.

Good: The vids and pics are exclusive. Many of the girls are hot, but not all. The hardcore has more belly down flat, enter from the rear prolonged fucking than I've seen at most sites. And it is HOT!! The vids of Montana Rae and Teagan Presley doing this will be replayed vividly in my mind as the death rattle takes hold, whenever that will be.

Bad: The vids are QT only and STREAMING ONLY. SHIT!! The pics are 900px on the long side (not too long, no). No zips, either, pardner. Not all of it is hardcore. Jana Cova and Sophie Paris, to give just two examples, are there to show off their stuff (mostly from 2+ years ago).

He advertises his DVDs, and that's what I think he's trying mostly to sell, but there are no content previews to speak of, just fairly brief descriptions.

A month membership just to the site costs $30. I just paid a visit and counted only 34 updates for this year so far. Nothing indicates any change in the past 20 or so months in terms of video access, pic sizes or zips. This info may not be technically "current," but it might be just as good nonetheless.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

jd1961 (0) I don't understand these kind of porno companies. They're almost as bad as Vivid.
09-28-07  08:05pm

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :

I see your point. Jack's streaming vids at least will display "full screen" and are replayable. Vivid's shit vids are in that tiny, tiny little window and offer no control to the user and are so long that any attempt at fowarding or replaying leads to total meltdown.

Vivid charges $10 for this pleasure; Jack's is $30 a month. I'd say Jack's is better than .. let me rephrase that: not as bad as Vivid, but still bad enough to leave the subscriber with that "got fucked over again" feeling.

09-29-07  02:52am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.