| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
If it's the right one, one will do. Usually, this does not happen, and of course, this is just one piece of the overall system. It won't matter whether it's one or twenty if the camera work and editing are poor.
|
10-20-13 03:17am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
Excellent poll question.
Ample timing and good angle shooting is of paramount importance. For me, it's a chief element that either makes or breaks a scene.
In fact, I believe most who're serious porn lovers share and strongly agree with my concerns relating to this stubborn and inexplicable shortcoming that simply too many men behind the camera won't turn loose.
Now, lets next tackle another egregious scene killer ... the overtime close-ups.
|
10-20-13 03:36am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
Camera work & editing are important.....but I'm spoiled into wanting to see the pretty faces as well as the other lovely parts of the ladies as well. I find a single camera filming porn to be very boring after 30 seconds.....I'm spoiled and want to see the whole experience, not just one angle of it.
|
10-20-13 06:27am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - graymane :
"Overtime closeups" is a good way of putting it. Sure have seen enough of those.
|
10-20-13 08:29am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
pat362 (0)
|
I need multiple angles for me to truly enjoy a porn video but that doesn't mean that the angles chosen will be the ones I would prefer but multiple is better than just one. That's why most POV porn does nothing for me.
|
10-20-13 09:06am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Marcus (0)
|
Great question, and for me, somewhat important. Like Drooler says, if it's the right one, one's fine, but often at least two is needed.
|
10-20-13 09:29am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
I punched "other" only because you very seldom really see more than one camera, though I would should be the standard set up for a shoot. I've watched some great one camera shoots, though I've watched some that sucked royal too, and for those, even two camera's might have been a waste. Any camera work depends on the skill of the operator - if he/she has the attention span of a flea, well - ya get what you pay for.
|
10-20-13 02:16pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
Bare with me please while I try to make better sense of the first part of my #2 message to this poll question .....
When I keyed in " stubborn and inexplicable shortcoming that simply too many men behind the camera won't turn loose." ..... the implication there completely had to do with videographers dwelling inordinately too long focused on the same scene. To drive that point home even more empathetically, I'll exemplify by specifically targeting those intolerably long stills with close ups of the following mobile body parts ... (not necessarily in this order)
1) pussy positioned in doggie mode. Man positioned close behind. (keep'em rolling)
2) Man's hairy ass (ball's-a-flopping) atop pussy (missionary) which is now positioned skyward
3) Pussy riding man's cock of which is positioned skyward.
4) Proceeding 1 thru 3 in said coital positions, we have pre-intercourse-obligatory blowjobs, of which chews up reels of tape monopolizing time and stopping the clock.
There we have it: (in part) Graymane's assessment of Pay porn's videographer's agonizing practice of drawn out stills and close ups which sucks the life out of good angle shootings.
|
10-20-13 03:01pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Thedebilman666 (Suspended)
|
Angles are everything. Crappy angels = cancelled membership.
|
10-20-13 08:24pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Capn (0)
|
As I am not into video, it is academic for me.
I suppose, if I were, a few would be good.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-20-13 10:30pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Denner (0)
|
Guess "multiple camera angles" can cover this:
What I really miss in newer porn - soft and hc - is more full body views......it's that same ol' deal, we've had here several times - much more foreplay, strip and full body view than a minute or two...and then it's just wham-bam-thank-you-mam.......
|
10-21-13 06:41am
Reply To Message
|
12
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #11 - Denner :
You just brought up the key words, denner: "full body views."
Full-body is really what I mostly meant.... before this growing age-related brain-weirdism bumped me off course again.
Testament, I suppose, of The big "80" coming up on birth's scoreboard in eight days.
In view of Graymane's threads and posts of late, No doubt there's respectable suspicions among PU observers that: Before, during and after this near century milestone is about to wave goodbye to age 79, that its obvious cranial doors have already swung open, setting free sizable numbers of wanderlust brain cells perched in gallop-mode just waiting for this moment.
Those remaining, like my general health, were unable to drag along their walkers, wheel chairs, and cell-serviced caregivers.
BTW, denner .... Really good to see you back around after what appears to be a long absence.
|
10-21-13 02:55pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #8 - graymane :
"Bare with me please" is a great pun. Oughta be the title of a porn flick.
|
10-21-13 05:08pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
turboshaft (0)
|
Somewhat important, but man can they be abused!
Less-is-more can work for the number of cameras if the operator/director is creative enough and at least a minimum of editing is done. Instead we get 30-45 minute single takes that are POV, wide-angle, and feel like endurance tests for the viewer.
Other times there are multiple angles from multiple cameras, but they are shown onscreen at the same time or the same action is simply repeated for the second angle after it's already been shown for the first. And then there are slo-mos, which feel like the porn equivalent of using double spacing on a paper to increase page count without any additional content. >:- |
|
10-21-13 05:49pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #13 - Drooler :
Sharp observance, droller! I Think it Sailed right over everybody else's head.
"Title of a Porn flick?" .... indeed!
Just be sure who's name shows up on screen amongst film credits.
|
10-21-13 08:01pm
Reply To Message
|
16
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #12 - graymane :
First, graymane - it's nice - again - to "talk" to old PU-friends. Yes, we agree on that full body-deal, for sure.
Not sure I understand the rest of your reply, but what I guess is your're still in good health and soon turning 80 - you probably got good genes and live to a hundred - if you'd want to...LOL. Take care, friend!
|
10-22-13 05:47am
Reply To Message
|
17
|
Homegirl (Disabled)
|
Multiple cameras work really well.They help a lot.
|
05-29-20 06:47am
Reply To Message
|
