Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
How does the shooting style of the newer stuff compare to the older content? My biggest issue with this site was that it was so badly shot that it was nearly unwatchable. The fact that he takes his face out of the video is also a problem for me because I need a connection to happen between both performers and that's ruined when one of them has a circle hiding his face whenever his face should be in the shot.
The static cameras are a problem for me but if he could actually use and handheld camera properly then that might be okay. I keep getting a special offer to join but since I have only saved a tiny portion of the past videos that I suspect the newer stuff will also not work for me.
|
12-30-13 01:34pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
I found the shooting style has improved. The static cameras get repositioned depending on the action and where it's happening in the room, so that helps too. I find that his POV abilities are very good.
The male performer still uses the circle to obscure his face. I don't find that to be a deal breaker because he mostly manages to keep his face out of the shots anyway.
What's the cost of the special offer?
|
12-30-13 01:39pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - rearadmiral :
See the fact that he goes out of his way to avoid showing his face is a problem for me because that means he'll avoid shooting from certain angles for fear that too many shots will have his face in them and he will have to use that stupid circle or he'll have to edit too much content to remove his face.
Mind you this guy is a genius when compared to the idiots at girls do porn. They also avoid showing the performers face and they use an actual camera operator but the shots are 100 times worse at GDP than here.
The sad part for me is that both sites manage to hire some really cute unknowns with great potential but completely mess the shoots so that these one and gone girls can never make it onto my wish list for more stuff.
|
12-30-13 01:48pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - pat362 :
I agree that I'd like to see many of these girls join the business and make more porn. Both this site and Exploited College Girls have some really attractive unknowns.
I find both Back Room Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls to be among the best in this niche. Broke Amateurs could have been a contender but instead of improving file resolution they've actually reduced it.
|
12-30-13 01:53pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
Another excellent review. I'm a member there currently and I agree about ECG and BCC being two of the best sites around, especially if you're into the casting niche, which I am.
One of the biggest downsides of this type of niche is having your one chance of seeing a porn video and photo set of a beautiful non professional girl wasted because of ineptitude. Occasionally you see what could be an amazing porn experience being completely ruined. It's a hard job, and I couldn't do it, but I wish some of them occasionally did it better. Having said all that, I think these two sites get the balance right most of the time.
|
12-30-13 06:00pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Tree Rodent :
Thanks for your comments.
Has the site been redesigned in the past few days? My membership expired last week and when I went back to the tour pages they look different now.
|
12-31-13 08:59am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral :
Can't speak for broke amateurs because their preview section is so poor that I would never join based only on that. True that the girls are really cute for the other two sites and sad that most never do more than these sites. I know the guy isn't located in California and that's why most of the girls don't make the jump to the industry.
P.S: I forgot to mention but the special offer is 19.99$ for the 3 sites mentioned yesterday.
|
12-31-13 09:13am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - pat362 :
That's a good price. I doubt I'll take the leap though since it was only a few days ago that my membership expired.
As for the models, some of them could easy become A-list models without much effort.
|
12-31-13 11:23am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - rearadmiral :
It looks different to the last time I was there, which was last year. I don't remember that many ads on the home page either. There's also bonus membership to Net Video Girls.
|
12-31-13 07:16pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #9 - Tree Rodent :
It was pretty plain but functional even a couple of weeks ago.
I'm not a fan of Net Video Girls. The site is a mess and the videos aren't great either. I did download some stuff but not much of it.
|
01-01-14 07:35am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
REPLY TO #10 - rearadmiral :
Net Video Girls wastes a lot of talent. Most of the time it looks like a chimpanzee is holding the camera, capturing random shots of anything that wanders in and out of view. However, I don't remember it being part of the deal before.
|
01-01-14 04:49pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #11 - Tree Rodent :
LOL! I think that's the best possible description of that site. I find the models are far less attractive than with ECG and BRCC too.
|
01-01-14 05:32pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
uscue (0)
|
Good review, I;ll probably join soon. Another casting site you may end up liking is Czech Casting, part of the CzechAV network. 3 month long member so far as I've also gotten into the casting genre recently. They have a bunch of content, but it's all in Czech -- thankfully they have subtitles.
|
01-05-14 07:56pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #13 - uscue :
One issue I have with the European casting sites is that so much of the setup involves the interaction between the model and the agent. If it isn't in English I find that detracts from the scene a lot. Not enough to avoid the site though, so I will have a look. Thanks for the tip.
|
01-08-14 01:40pm
Reply To Message
|