Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
Exceptionally fine review, RB ....... but then I wouldn't expect less from you.
When they say "Puffy" are they referring to those lovely, swelled, lusciously protruding pussies? Cuz I do love'm puffed up like that!
|
01-05-14 08:05pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - graymane :
Thanks, graymane.
I wouldn't say swelled up and protruding. They categorize the girls' "nether regions" in 3 groups: Puffy PEACH, what some people call "innies". Think Miela, if you know she is. If not, hit Google and you'll figure it out. Juicy CHERRY means more or less your average looking vagina and Big TACOs are the Labia Masters.
|
01-06-14 02:08pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
turboshaft (0)
|
Great review, RB! I've been thinking about joining this site for a while now--well, really just Wet and Pissy, as those two words encompass nearly everything I seek out in porn--but if this is the same price for two additional sites, it's obviously the better deal. I guess I'll wait a little while on a review once I join (and don't want to risk carpal tunnel syndrome either!). Your comments on camera work are also a lot more than what I usually manage, the typically redundant "Me see naughty parts in video. Me get horny."
Also, your reply to graymane about use of the term "puffy," that "Big TACOs are the Labia Masters" is hilarious (though I would think the title "Labia Mistress" is more correct). If that were a real award or title it would be one I wouldn't think twice about accepting! :-)
|
01-06-14 05:40pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - turboshaft :
Thank you as well, turbo. Yeah - it's definitely worth a join.
And, yes, you are correct. It should have been Mistresses. I'm turning in my Grammar Nazi badge (and arm band, of course).
|
01-06-14 07:34pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
turboshaft (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - RagingBuddhist :
LOL Maybe you enjoyed this site so much it's turned down your rage somewhat?
Though to be honest I certainly hope it hasn't--I don't want to the sole rageaholic here!
|
01-06-14 10:27pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
wetandpuffy (0) Webmaster
|
Good morning ,
Wayne here from Puffynetwork.com
I would like to start by saying it is great to read such an honest and brilliant review.
It is nice to see somebody who appreciates the good and can also give such constructive feedback, it has been a pleasure to read.
At puffynetwork we are a very small team who want to make our sites special and be exactly what our fans and friends want and by reading reviews like yours help me improve what we have over here and make it even better.
We have already started looking into the comments regarding the pictures sets and have made contact with our host about the inconsistent speeds.
We host all our content on CDN which should mean everyone gets the very best in speeds but from reading your remarks we see this is not happening and want to make sure this is improved.
I would once again like to thank you for your great review and hope we can keep in touch.
Best Regards
Wayne
|
01-07-14 06:08am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - turboshaft :
LOL You can't be serious. Nothing - NOTHING - affects the rage. But even I have to admit that there are moments when things aren't red hot.
|
01-07-14 09:33am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #6 - wetandpuffy :
Hi Wayne. Glad you appreciate the review. It's always good to see the people from the sites chiming in here.
I joined your site some time last year and the layout has definitely changed since then. I can't put my finger on exactly what all is different, but I can't say I remember the flash-based picture viewing at all. While I'm sure there are people who like it, to me, in browser viewing has always seemed to be the most consistently glitch-free way to go. I think that giving the user a choice between the two would be a nice addition.
As far as download speeds go, I only reported what I saw. To be fair, the problem could be on my end. Hopefully someone else here will join and put up their findings.
While I have your attention, I would like to address something I didn't feel the need to include in my review. Please tell me you're getting away from putting those long music intros on your videos. I do notice that there are a lot less of them since I last signed up there and I think that's a definite improvement.
All in all, a really good site - one I'm sure I'll come back to from time to time. Thanks again for adding the personal touch by responding here.
|
01-07-14 09:52am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
wetandpuffy (0) Webmaster
|
REPLY TO #8 - RagingBuddhist :
You are more then welcome. You are the guys that keep my sites alive and I thank you for it and thank you for taking your time to review and make my sites better.
Here is my answers below.
1) For the picture viewer , I can definitly do this and offer both types of viewer and a way to switch between them. What I will be doing in febuary is spending some time in my members areas tweaking and making them better, so any more points you have. please keep them coming and if they make the site better then they will be taken care off.
2) Music in videos , yes we are moving away from this as we agree it was a bit of a distraction to the video.
Thanks once again.
Regards
Wayne
|
01-13-14 12:28am
Reply To Message
|