Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Exploited Teens (0)

Newbie 75* rearadmiral (0) 04-27-14  12:55pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site - Beautiful models - Mostly quasi-amateurs - Some models have gone on to big porn careers - Supports download managers - Good download speeds - Appears to update weekly Cons: - Good porn let down by a weak website - No preview pictures (though many scenes have a short preview video) - No options for file types or resolutions - Low resolution for 2014 - No photos Bottom Line: I’ve often written that for a site to be great there needs to be three things happening: the porn has to be good, the site has to be good and the scenes need to be easily accessible in a way that members can use. This site is a case of only getting one out of three right, and that’s having good porn. But since that’s subjective your opinion might be different. I’m fairly confident that no one will disagree with my objective assessment that the site needs some work. The genre that the site fits into is the quasi-amateur site where fresh-faced models come to perform a rare scene. The models are all relatively young (18-22), almost all are Caucasian, body types can vary a bit but most of them are petite. Some of the models have gone on to become big porn stars, but most are more obscure than that. While many of the models have other scenes (often on similar sites), most have little exposure if that’s something that you like. This is a large site that started in 2000. There are currently 570 videos available and it appears that there is a new one added weekly. I say that it ‘appears’ that it updates weekly because I can’t be certain since none of the scenes are dated. All of the scenes follow a formula, which some will take issue with. I’m indifferent to sites that offer formulaic porn as long as the formula works, and in this case it does. The formula is simple: the POV camera pans up a bed to the model and she is introduced and interviewed. There are some poses with clothes, the clothes come off, there is oral on the male cameraman, there is usually (but not always) vaginal sex, and the scene always concludes with the POV cameraman jerking off on the model’s face. I’m no fan of watching a guy jerk off on a woman’s face (the jerking part, I’m fine with facials) but it’s so common in porn now that there’s really no point in complaining. The cameraman (and presumably the site owner) is good at POV work but not the best I’ve seen. One thing he does right is recognize that the scene isn’t about him so he doesn’t try to upstage the models. Some will complain that he talks too much, but I find that doesn’t detract from the scene and probably helps it by keeping a connection between the performers. As with many similar site, the main strength is the models who appear. Many are really good looking and worth watching. One thing that I really like is that the models begin the scene in street clothes. I really prefer this over a sleazy porn outfit. The site made the right choice in this. Apart from the good porn this site really has little else going for it. The site design is less than simple: it’s outdated. And apart from being outdated, some of the choices the designers made are just bad. For one thing, the site is backwards. When you enter the first page with scenes you’re on the page with the oldest videos. Once you’re on a page you want the only way you can decide if you want to download a scene is from a small thumbnail. If you like a particular body type you may be disappointed with what you download. There is no search function, there are no tags and there are no links if a model has more than one scene on the site. The downloads themselves are well below industry specs. There are no options for file types or resolutions. WMV is the only type available. The two most common resolutions are 640x480 and 704x396. There are a few at 720x480. Bitrates are 3200kb/s. I’m willing to accept that older scenes won’t be available in better resolutions, but in 2014 these resolutions don’t cut it. At a minimum the scenes should be 1280x720. They don’t look bad, but they still need to improve. Download managers are allowed and I had no problem with links timing out. Download speeds were the same as I get elsewhere. When I joined many of the scenes (maybe a year and half of them) provided no model name at all. The site explained this choice as an attempt to reduce piracy since a search for the site name a model name would bring up tub-site links. While this is better than streaming-only or DRM, I found it annoying since I prefer to sort the scenes by model name and if I like the model I might be able to find more her elsewhere. Sometime in the past two weeks the site has reversed this policy and now includes the model’s name on page, though the download still has a generic name. I can live with that now that I know the model’s name and can change the file name. So would I recommend this site? Yes, with some caveats and reservations. If you like this kind of porn (quasi-amateur, casting style) then it’s worth joining as long as you recognize that the site needs a lot of work and even the newest downloads aren’t up to standards. What baffles me is that the site owner obviously puts a lot of work into shooting the scenes and then drops the ball by having a website that has been past its ‘best before’ date for several years. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (7) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 graymane (Suspended) I'm passing on some very important info to the right people upstairs, RA, about lookin' into providing you with a much deserved reciprocal Company retirement package. Yep! you heard me right! The unstoppable flow of your numerous, comprehensively reviewed sites, courted by an unmatched editorial quality born of each review, that would be the envy of any noted, local news pundit serving on any paper within the U-S-of-A ...... I figure your notoriously proven power of sway, guiding judgment, and directing fellow members in the right direction, not to mention the blood-sweat-an-tears that went into each effort on your part.... all of which, adding up to awarding you at least equal monetary allotment.... with and among which the whole being shared by our PU founders, their loyal, time-honored and presently entrenched staff. 04-29-14  02:41am Reply To Message 2 Tree Rodent (0) ^^ Yep I'm with what graymane says. I'm not here much now, but the least I can do is drop by to congratulaute you on yet another very high quality informative review. This is one that I almost went with over a year ago, but what put me off is the low quality resolutions, and if you get used to that high spec material, you do notice the difference. 04-29-14  11:44am Reply To Message 3 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #1 - graymane : Thanks for your kind words Sir. It's nice to know that some folks find my reviews useful. 05-04-14  09:03am Reply To Message 4 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #2 - Tree Rodent : Thanks for taking the time to comment. I have no idea why the site owners continue to offer only one (low) resolution. This really is a case of some good porn let down by a poor site. The site and the downloads may have been state-of-the-art back when they started, but it really needs a modernization now. 05-04-14  09:05am Reply To Message 5 uscue (0) REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral : Do they still actively update at all? 05-06-14  05:06pm Reply To Message 6 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #5 - uscue : I don't think so. The reason I can't be sure is it looks like there were some scenes added while I was a member but I suspect they were re-posts of older scenes. They looked old. 05-06-14  05:39pm Reply To Message 7 Licker (0) REPLY TO #5 - uscue : No, they don't update at all. They've even removed a lot of scenes: older and newer ones. I'm on my 2nd month and just cancelled since nothing has been added since I resubscribed. It's a dead site now. 06-17-14  11:12am Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.