| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
turboshaft (0)
|
Bottom Line, since I tend to ramble (though this is usually a good sign that I like the site). I also sometimes have trouble coming up with a good score.
|
06-13-14 02:47am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
If it's hard to do, I don't. I'm lazy & only write reviews when I have something(s) to say. Once I start talking however, I'm also too lazy to shut up quickly, so the review just comes out naturally.
|
06-13-14 12:45pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I feel that a review has to be written in prose, but the standard format for pro's and con's here is bullet points. That doesn't necessarily easy, because you have imply analysis based on what you expect people to want to know. Still, the bottom line I find harder to do if I really want to write it well.
If I don't give much of a squat, then there's no big difference. It all comes out like it's from a semi-automatic firearm: bullet, bullet, bullet ...
Lazy reviewers are actually better for lazy readers, anyway.
|
06-13-14 04:34pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
pat362 (0)
|
It really depends on the site I'm reviewing. I tend to have a little harder time with the bottom only bat that's usually because I'm trying to get my point across without rambling on.
|
06-13-14 06:17pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Monahan (0)
|
The number of points the site is worth.
How do I score a lousy site? A great site? A lousy site with some good/great stuff, a great site with superb content but lousy navigation, a good site that has crummy business practices, etc.
There are so many variables, good & bad, that it makes it very tough to decide on a single score.
|
06-13-14 10:24pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
I think cons are the ones I am most careful with, what I wrote and how I do so can affect a websites income. So my goal is to be as accurate as possible.
|
06-14-14 09:54am
Reply To Message
|
