| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
I'm sorry you got fooled and maybe there should be more warnings but I think you are partially to blame here. I think you did what most of us have done at least once in our life and went with your heart rather than your brain. You clearly noticed that the TBP review was three years old which should have been your first clue that something might be wrong but your second clue and in my opinion the more obvious one is that the site facts have not been updated in 2 years which means that the review is for all intense and purposes null and void as the site could be completely different. The third clue and you can be forgiven for not looking at it is that if you look at The bottom of the TBP page for this site. You will notice that Rabbit did a review this year and the site got a 58%. I rarely look at other review sites but this is a case where I would only because I prefer to have the most up to date info.
|
09-02-14 06:01pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
jook (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
No argument from me, guilty as charged. My only concern is why PU or TBP would continue to list a site with info 4 years old and more. That really is the only rationale I had for joining, the mistaken belief that if it's listed on these sites it's on the up and up. Still, mea culpa.
|
09-02-14 06:07pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - jook :
I can't be certain but my guess is that they still list it because it is still active and they offer a significant discount to TBP/PU members so although you did not like the site. Someone else might be satisfied with content that is 3 years and older. Especially if they aren't too picky about screen resolution which appear to be only 640x480 for the videos.
I highly recommend you take a look at many other sites listed on TBP/PU and you will notice that quite a few of them haven't updated in many years. Just look at my back and forth with the webmaster for busty buffy and you will see that their sites have old content and aren't updating anymore.
I joined the Claudia Marie site because of the TBP discount and do you know what my 10$ got me. Videos that can only be downloaded in 428x240. You can stream them in HD but I don't join a pay site that allows downloads to stream in HD but download in crappy resolution.
|
09-02-14 06:34pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
As Pat mentions, we continue to list the site because it is still active (accepting members) and still provides content ... albeit, quite old. Some users don't mind an "archive" site.
In future, I would encourage you to look at the TBP listing page along with the PU listing. The TBP listing for this site clearly states that the last update was in June of 2011. While it's been a while since it was checked, it seems that's still totally accurate info.
I am sorry you joined a site that you didn't like. We do appreciate that you took the time to give fellow users here a heads up that they're still not updating.
|
09-02-14 06:59pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
jook (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Khan :
Ok, gotcha. I'm still feeling my way around this murky new world. Lesson learned.
|
09-02-14 07:02pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
Jook - This is what's known as "taking one for the team". I think everybody's joined a clunker at least once and that's where PU comes into play. You've already commented on your experience, now it might be good to actually review it to help warn other "victims" about what they might expect.
|
09-02-14 07:38pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
jook (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - RagingBuddhist :
I'm not sure what benefit to other users a review would serve. I literally spent under 45 minutes on the site and there's not much to add then what's in the comment. And I'm not going back there because there's not much else to see and I'm afraid I'll suffer sever psychological trauma if I have to look at it again, haha. Again, still feeling my way around, but doesn't the comment serve the same warning that a review would?
|
09-03-14 02:13am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
jook (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Khan :
Khan, in hindsight, I've got to disagree with you here. Just because a site provides content doesn't mean it should warrant a listing on a trusted review site. That's my opinion. Better content can be found on free sites, seriously. And more importantly, this site is engaging in murky financial policies. I believe PU would be doing more of a service to members to take the listing down rather than have them experience what I have.
|
09-03-14 02:20am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #8 - jook :
Your opinion is noted.
|
09-03-14 08:00am
Reply To Message
|
