| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
I completely agree with you but we all knew that this was going to happen to them at some point. It's not like they can upload actual new content. There is simply not enough out there and most of it is now limited to the studios own site and they don't want to get the pittance VB would offer them for that content.
VB would be far better served in looking to upload older content that must still exist somewhere and which many fans would love to see than to add the same compilation crap over and over.
|
12-14-14 09:11am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
I just finished a month membership there and saw this happen twice - where a scene gets uploaded twice in a week because it appears in two crappy compilations. I suspect that there are some scenes on the site six times. Maybe more.
I've said it many times that VB would do well to change their business model. Push quality over quantity. I'd be happy with two good uploads per day rather than four crappy ones and one decent one.
|
12-15-14 04:10pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
While I agree with you that it would be great if VB would licence and upload some older titles I don't know that they'd be better served overall. I'd love to have access to a wider catalogue of titles from good studios from the 1990s and 2000s.
But the problem with that is that's when guys our age started to get access to good porn and it means something to us. And guys like us are creeping into 'old man' category but some standards. So the younger members might not appreciate these older titles like we would.
I would definitely support a site that gave me decent quality old Anabolic/Diabolic stuff. And many other studios. Maybe I could fulfil my dream of owning every scene Tammi Ann or Inari Vachs did.
|
12-15-14 04:17pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - rearadmiral :
I agree with everything you said but let's be honest. It's old farts like us that still pay for porn so sites might as well cater to our needs because the young ones are getting their porn on tube sites so trying to attract them as new customers or retain them is a waste of time.
|
12-15-14 05:43pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :
Good point. If VB, or any other site, followed your suggestion I'd sign up for a long-term membership to support them.
|
12-15-14 05:53pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - rearadmiral :
These days I get more pleasure out of the movies the classic porn site uploads than anything else other sites have to offer and we are talking about some mediocre looking movies. it's just that they are the movies I've been looking for and I can live with a good movie that looks bad. I can no longer stand bad movies that look good.
|
12-16-14 05:47pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - pat362 :
I'm with you. I purged my collection last year but couldn't part with some classics even though they're low resolution. I'm always on the hunt for more.
|
12-17-14 06:02pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - rearadmiral :
I'm from the old school where no one had any clue what HD meant so I don't care that the resolution is subpar when compared to almost anything done today. As long as I can see the performers and the action than that is more than acceptable. I found some movies that I thought I never would on the classic porn and it makes staying a member well worth it for me.
|
12-18-14 06:00pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Monahan (0)
|
I'm a 10 year continuous member from way back with the one update per day, through an update every 4+ hours to the 5 at a time daily updates.
I'm OK with the ratio of crapola to good stuff because there have been a few crappy updates with some really good stuff hidden away in them. For example a few weeks ago there was a really crummy video that had a pre-enhancement Venus Knight video where she "outnastied" her nastiest later stuff.
I just wish they would improve their accuracy in model identification, but that's a subject for another comment.
|
12-30-14 11:53am
Reply To Message
|
